Comparative evaluation of temperature generation during laser lithotripsy: thulium fiber laser, pulsed thulium: YAG, and holmium: YAG with pulse modulation in an ex vivo porcine kidney model

Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy results in heat generation, raising concern for thermal injury. As laser platforms evolve, comparative assessment of their thermal profiles is increasingly important. This study presents the first comparative evaluation of temperature generation using three contemporary systems: pulsed thulium: YAG (Tm: YAG; Dornier Thulio), thulium fiber laser (TFL; Olympus SOLTIVE), holmium: YAG with pulse modulation (MOSES 2.0; Boston Scientific MOSES 2.0) using manufacturer-recommended dusting settings in an ex vivo porcine kidney model. Eighteen porcine kidney–ureter units were implanted with renal pelvic temperature probes and Bego stones. Specimens were randomized to one of three lithotripsy systems (n = 6 per group; one MOSES specimen excluded). A flexible ureteroscope was introduced via a 35 cm 10/12Fr ureteral access sheath, followed by 10 min of near-continuous dusting using 200 μm fibers (0.3 J/50Hz for TFL and Tm: YAG; 0.3 J/60 Hz for MOSES 2.0). Pressurized irrigation was maintained at 100-150mmHg. Outcomes included absolute temperature change, total energy delivered, and temperature increase normalized to energy (°C/kJ). The greatest mean temperature rise was observed with TFL (8.13 ± 1.96 °C), followed by pulsed Tm: YAG (4.12 ± 1.26 °C) and MOSES 2.0 (3.32 ± 1.84 °C). TFL demonstrated significantly greater heat generation than Tm: YAG (p = 0.0031) and MOSES 2.0 (p = 0.0010). When temperature was adjusted for energy delivery, TFL (1.09 ± 0.30 °C/kJ) surpassed both Tm: YAG (0.47 ± 0.14 °C/kJ; p = 0.0007) and MOSES 2.0 (0.31 ± 0.18 °C/kJ; p = 0.0001). No specimen exceeded temperatures of 43 °C. In this ex vivo setting, TFL was associated with higher heat generation relative to both pulsed Tm: YAG and MOSES 2.0; however, all systems remained below accepted thermal safety thresholds under the tested conditions (43 °C).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urolithiasis
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-026-01957-8
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of temperature generation during laser lithotripsy: thulium fiber laser, pulsed thulium: YAG, and holmium: YAG with pulse modulation in an ex vivo porcine kidney model

Tyler Sheetz, Sirpi Nackeeran, Bruce M. Gao, Luke Griffiths et al.
Urolithiasis
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Comparative evaluation of temperature generation during laser lithotripsy: thulium fiber laser, pulsed thulium: YAG, and holmium: YAG with pulse modulation in an ex vivo porcine kidney model

Tyler Sheetz, Sirpi Nackeeran, Bruce M. Gao, Luke Griffiths, Vincent Nguyen, Seyedamirvala Saadat, Aymon N. Ali, Jamie L. Finegan, Tiffany R. Huang, Roshan M. Patel, Seth K. Bechis, Helen Gao, Yezan Hadidi, Harel Sims
article en

Abstract

Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy results in heat generation, raising concern for thermal injury. As laser platforms evolve, comparative assessment of their thermal profiles is increasingly important. This study presents the first comparative evaluation of temperature generation using three contemporary systems: pulsed thulium: YAG (Tm: YAG; Dornier Thulio), thulium fiber laser (TFL; Olympus SOLTIVE), holmium: YAG with pulse modulation (MOSES 2.0; Boston Scientific MOSES 2.0) using manufacturer-recommended dusting settings in an ex vivo porcine kidney model. Eighteen porcine kidney–ureter units were implanted with renal pelvic temperature probes and Bego stones. Specimens were randomized to one of three lithotripsy systems (n = 6 per group; one MOSES specimen excluded). A flexible ureteroscope was introduced via a 35 cm 10/12Fr ureteral access sheath, followed by 10 min of near-continuous dusting using 200 μm fibers (0.3 J/50Hz for TFL and Tm: YAG; 0.3 J/60 Hz for MOSES 2.0). Pressurized irrigation was maintained at 100-150mmHg. Outcomes included absolute temperature change, total energy delivered, and temperature increase normalized to energy (°C/kJ). The greatest mean temperature rise was observed with TFL (8.13 ± 1.96 °C), followed by pulsed Tm: YAG (4.12 ± 1.26 °C) and MOSES 2.0 (3.32 ± 1.84 °C). TFL demonstrated significantly greater heat generation than Tm: YAG (p = 0.0031) and MOSES 2.0 (p = 0.0010). When temperature was adjusted for energy delivery, TFL (1.09 ± 0.30 °C/kJ) surpassed both Tm: YAG (0.47 ± 0.14 °C/kJ; p = 0.0007) and MOSES 2.0 (0.31 ± 0.18 °C/kJ; p = 0.0001). No specimen exceeded temperatures of 43 °C. In this ex vivo setting, TFL was associated with higher heat generation relative to both pulsed Tm: YAG and MOSES 2.0; however, all systems remained below accepted thermal safety thresholds under the tested conditions (43 °C).

UrolithiasisVol. 54(1)
University of California, Irvine (US), University of California San Diego (US), University of California, Irvine Medical Center (US), UC Irvine Health (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.