Genetically Informed Research Designs in Perinatal Pharmacoepidemiology: A Methodological Overview

Despite the widespread use of medications during pregnancy, ethical and methodological barriers to clinical trials make observational studies necessary for evaluating medication safety in this population. Observational studies are prone to biases that often limit their validity due to the lack of randomization; integrating genetic information through discordant sibling designs, polygenic scores, and Mendelian randomization can address several confounding issues. However, application of these three approaches in perinatal pharmacoepidemiology has been limited. Complementing traditional designs with these genetically informed research designs can tackle common biases and strengthen causal inference. This paper focuses on applying genetically informed research designs to child outcomes in perinatal pharmacoepidemiology by reviewing various methods, discussing their strengths and limitations, and examining their application to date, as well as considerations for implementing them in future research. Such considerations include the availability of genetic data, the complexity of integrating genetic data with existing epidemiological data, and selection of appropriate genetic instruments for analyses. Incorporating causal inference in perinatal pharmacoepidemiology can ultimately contribute to enhancing safe medication use during pregnancy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drug Safety
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-026-01647-9
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetically Informed Research Designs in Perinatal Pharmacoepidemiology: A Methodological Overview

Emilie Willoch Olstad, Kristina Gervin, Mahmoud Zidan, Alexis Carson et al.
Drug Safety
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
article

Genetically Informed Research Designs in Perinatal Pharmacoepidemiology: A Methodological Overview

Emilie Willoch Olstad, Kristina Gervin, Mahmoud Zidan, Alexis Carson, Iris E. Scholte, Marleen M. H. J. van Gelder, Eivind Ystrøm, Tessel E. Galesloot, Hedvig Nordeng
article en

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of medications during pregnancy, ethical and methodological barriers to clinical trials make observational studies necessary for evaluating medication safety in this population. Observational studies are prone to biases that often limit their validity due to the lack of randomization; integrating genetic information through discordant sibling designs, polygenic scores, and Mendelian randomization can address several confounding issues. However, application of these three approaches in perinatal pharmacoepidemiology has been limited. Complementing traditional designs with these genetically informed research designs can tackle common biases and strengthen causal inference. This paper focuses on applying genetically informed research designs to child outcomes in perinatal pharmacoepidemiology by reviewing various methods, discussing their strengths and limitations, and examining their application to date, as well as considerations for implementing them in future research. Such considerations include the availability of genetic data, the complexity of integrating genetic data with existing epidemiological data, and selection of appropriate genetic instruments for analyses. Incorporating causal inference in perinatal pharmacoepidemiology can ultimately contribute to enhancing safe medication use during pregnancy.

Drug Safety
Oslo University Hospital (NO), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Oslo (NO), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (NL)
European Commission, Norges Forskningsråd
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.