Soybean Plant-back Following an Amicarbazone and Metribuzin Application for Corn

Abstract The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed increased restrictions and lower application rates for atrazine. Corn growers need to have options for weed control and increased scrutiny of atrazine may limit effective photosystem II-inhibiting herbicides. One alternative is the premixture of amicarbazone and metribuzin. The atrazine label prohibits planting soybean until the following year, limiting producers to replanting corn or grain sorghum after a failed stand. Amicarbazone allows a four-month soybean rotation interval, potentially enabling planting of the crop the same season as failed corn. Therefore, research was conducted in 2023 and 2024 in Fayetteville, AR, to evaluate soybean tolerance to an amicarbazone and metribuzin premixture after a simulated failed corn stand. Amicarbazone was applied at 245, 490, and 735 g ai ha -1 alone and in combination with metribuzin at 140, 280, and 420 g ai ha -1 . Soybean was planted following at least 1.3 cm of rainfall, (19-20 days after application). The label allows amicarbazone and metribuzin to be applied to corn at 336 and 190 g ha -1 , respectively, on silt loam soil with organic matter at 1.5 to 2%. The combination of amicarbazone and metribuzin at 735 and 420 g ha -1 , respectively, more than twice the labeled rate for corn, induced 61 to 91% soybean injury 14 days after emergence (DAE). When amicarbazone and metribuzin rates were reduced to 245 and 140 g ha -1 , respectively, the injury was 4% in both years, 14 DAE. Yield reductions were only seen in treatments with amicarbazone at 735 g ha -1 applied alone or in combination with metribuzin at 420 g ha -1 . Overall, crop response and yield reductions should be expected with an amicarbazone and metribuzin premixture at the highest rates used in this study. However, the label for the premixture will not allow these rates to be applied.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Weed Technology
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2026.10089
Primary Topic
Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soybean Plant-back Following an Amicarbazone and Metribuzin Application for Corn

Jason K. Norsworthy, Ryan S. Henry, Michael R. Dodde, L. Tom Barber
Weed Technology
Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
article

Soybean Plant-back Following an Amicarbazone and Metribuzin Application for Corn

Jason K. Norsworthy, Ryan S. Henry, Michael R. Dodde, L. Tom Barber
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed increased restrictions and lower application rates for atrazine. Corn growers need to have options for weed control and increased scrutiny of atrazine may limit effective photosystem II-inhibiting herbicides. One alternative is the premixture of amicarbazone and metribuzin. The atrazine label prohibits planting soybean until the following year, limiting producers to replanting corn or grain sorghum after a failed stand. Amicarbazone allows a four-month soybean rotation interval, potentially enabling planting of the crop the same season as failed corn. Therefore, research was conducted in 2023 and 2024 in Fayetteville, AR, to evaluate soybean tolerance to an amicarbazone and metribuzin premixture after a simulated failed corn stand. Amicarbazone was applied at 245, 490, and 735 g ai ha -1 alone and in combination with metribuzin at 140, 280, and 420 g ai ha -1 . Soybean was planted following at least 1.3 cm of rainfall, (19-20 days after application). The label allows amicarbazone and metribuzin to be applied to corn at 336 and 190 g ha -1 , respectively, on silt loam soil with organic matter at 1.5 to 2%. The combination of amicarbazone and metribuzin at 735 and 420 g ha -1 , respectively, more than twice the labeled rate for corn, induced 61 to 91% soybean injury 14 days after emergence (DAE). When amicarbazone and metribuzin rates were reduced to 245 and 140 g ha -1 , respectively, the injury was 4% in both years, 14 DAE. Yield reductions were only seen in treatments with amicarbazone at 735 g ha -1 applied alone or in combination with metribuzin at 420 g ha -1 . Overall, crop response and yield reductions should be expected with an amicarbazone and metribuzin premixture at the highest rates used in this study. However, the label for the premixture will not allow these rates to be applied.

Weed Technology
Nalu Scientific (United States) (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
University of Cambridge
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.