Anaesthetic Management of Neurofibromatosis of an Unknown Subtype for Emergency Caesarean Section

Neurofibromatosis is a heterogeneous group of inherited neurocutaneous disorders with variable multisystem involvement and important implications for obstetric anaesthesia. Anaesthetic concerns include potential airway involvement, occult spinal or intracranial tumours, cardiovascular instability, and the association with catecholamine-secreting tumours. These factors often lead to a preference for general anaesthesia, despite well-recognised maternal risks associated with general anaesthesia in obstetric practice. Decision-making is further complicated when neurofibromatosis is previously undiagnosed and unclassified, and when preoperative imaging is unavailable. We report the case of a 33-year-old gravida 3 para 2 woman at term gestation who required emergency caesarean delivery for fetal distress after declining a trial of vaginal birth following a previous caesarean section. She had extensive cutaneous neurofibromas but no prior diagnosis, genetic classification, or radiological evaluation. The subtype of neurofibromatosis was therefore unknown at presentation. Clinical assessment revealed no neurological symptoms, no focal neurological deficits, no features suggestive of raised intracranial pressure, no clinical evidence of airway or mediastinal involvement, and no history suggestive of catecholamine excess. The case occurred in a resource-limited setting, where urgent neuroimaging was not available. Following senior anaesthetic assessment and informed consent, spinal anaesthesia was selected after careful consideration of the relative risks of neuraxial versus general anaesthesia in the context of diagnostic uncertainty and obstetric urgency. Intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl was administered, producing an adequate surgical block. Anticipated spinal-induced hypotension was managed with titrated phenylephrine boluses, and haemodynamic stability was maintained throughout the procedure. The caesarean section and postoperative course were uneventful, with no neurological or cardiovascular complications. This case highlights the importance of phenotype-based clinical risk stratification when managing parturients with suspected but unclassified neurofibromatosis. In the absence of neurological deficits or features suggestive of raised intracranial pressure, neuraxial anaesthesia may be a reasonable option even when imaging is unavailable. This approach may be particularly relevant in emergency obstetric scenarios and resource-limited settings, where delays associated with investigation may increase maternal and fetal risk. The case adds to limited evidence supporting judicious use of spinal anaesthesia in selected parturients with suspected neurofibromatosis and underscores the need for individualized clinical judgement rather than routine exclusion of neuraxial techniques.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.104539
Primary Topic
Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anaesthetic Management of Neurofibromatosis of an Unknown Subtype for Emergency Caesarean Section

Ryan Glaser, Stephanie Shirto
Cureus
Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
article

Anaesthetic Management of Neurofibromatosis of an Unknown Subtype for Emergency Caesarean Section

Ryan Glaser, Stephanie Shirto
article en

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis is a heterogeneous group of inherited neurocutaneous disorders with variable multisystem involvement and important implications for obstetric anaesthesia. Anaesthetic concerns include potential airway involvement, occult spinal or intracranial tumours, cardiovascular instability, and the association with catecholamine-secreting tumours. These factors often lead to a preference for general anaesthesia, despite well-recognised maternal risks associated with general anaesthesia in obstetric practice. Decision-making is further complicated when neurofibromatosis is previously undiagnosed and unclassified, and when preoperative imaging is unavailable. We report the case of a 33-year-old gravida 3 para 2 woman at term gestation who required emergency caesarean delivery for fetal distress after declining a trial of vaginal birth following a previous caesarean section. She had extensive cutaneous neurofibromas but no prior diagnosis, genetic classification, or radiological evaluation. The subtype of neurofibromatosis was therefore unknown at presentation. Clinical assessment revealed no neurological symptoms, no focal neurological deficits, no features suggestive of raised intracranial pressure, no clinical evidence of airway or mediastinal involvement, and no history suggestive of catecholamine excess. The case occurred in a resource-limited setting, where urgent neuroimaging was not available. Following senior anaesthetic assessment and informed consent, spinal anaesthesia was selected after careful consideration of the relative risks of neuraxial versus general anaesthesia in the context of diagnostic uncertainty and obstetric urgency. Intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl was administered, producing an adequate surgical block. Anticipated spinal-induced hypotension was managed with titrated phenylephrine boluses, and haemodynamic stability was maintained throughout the procedure. The caesarean section and postoperative course were uneventful, with no neurological or cardiovascular complications. This case highlights the importance of phenotype-based clinical risk stratification when managing parturients with suspected but unclassified neurofibromatosis. In the absence of neurological deficits or features suggestive of raised intracranial pressure, neuraxial anaesthesia may be a reasonable option even when imaging is unavailable. This approach may be particularly relevant in emergency obstetric scenarios and resource-limited settings, where delays associated with investigation may increase maternal and fetal risk. The case adds to limited evidence supporting judicious use of spinal anaesthesia in selected parturients with suspected neurofibromatosis and underscores the need for individualized clinical judgement rather than routine exclusion of neuraxial techniques.

Cureus
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.