Autism data sharing: Benefits, challenges, and recommendations

Data sharing is a key element of scientific research, but it is associated with many complex legal, ethical, and practical challenges. These are particularly salient in autism research, where concerns have been raised about researchers' intentions, research priorities not aligning with those of autistic people, and differing opinions within stakeholder communities as to what priorities should be addressed. This review paper was co-produced through an iterative collaborative process to incorporate diverse viewpoints of stakeholder representatives from academia, charity, industry, the medical community, and the autism community. We discuss the main benefits and challenges of autism data sharing and argue that the perspectives of autistic people must be central to discussions around its ethical and technological aspects. We outline recommendations for ethical and responsible data sharing practices and note key developments within the field, including federated data sharing and community platforms and registries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Digital Health
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001249
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Autism data sharing: Benefits, challenges, and recommendations

Dean M. Hartley, Brett Trost, Miro Cupak, Síofra Heraty et al.
PLOS Digital Health
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Autism data sharing: Benefits, challenges, and recommendations

Dean M. Hartley, Brett Trost, Miro Cupak, Síofra Heraty, Ciara J. Molloy, Fabio Campana, David Belton, Madeleine Bloomfield, Alison Boyle, Azadeh Kushki, T. P. Charman, Evdokia Anagnostou, Sarah Douglas, Erica Stevenson, Christopher Chatham, Julian Tillmann, Rosemary Holt, Alexandra Lautarescu, Bethany Oakley
article en

Abstract

Data sharing is a key element of scientific research, but it is associated with many complex legal, ethical, and practical challenges. These are particularly salient in autism research, where concerns have been raised about researchers' intentions, research priorities not aligning with those of autistic people, and differing opinions within stakeholder communities as to what priorities should be addressed. This review paper was co-produced through an iterative collaborative process to incorporate diverse viewpoints of stakeholder representatives from academia, charity, industry, the medical community, and the autism community. We discuss the main benefits and challenges of autism data sharing and argue that the perspectives of autistic people must be central to discussions around its ethical and technological aspects. We outline recommendations for ethical and responsible data sharing practices and note key developments within the field, including federated data sharing and community platforms and registries.

PLOS Digital HealthVol. 5(3)
Autism Speaks (US), Roche (Switzerland) (CH), Institut Pasteur (FR), King's College London (GB), University of Toronto (CA), Trinity College Dublin (IE), University of Cambridge (GB), Hospital for Sick Children (CA), Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital (CA), Bridge University (SS), Ontario Stroke Network (CA), Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.