Evaluating Guideline Adherence in Gemini‐Powered Dental Trauma Workflows: Standalone Gemini Chat vs. Document‐Grounded NotebookLM
The responses generated from the guidelines were highly consistent with both workflows. Document grounding may enhance repeatability and alignment with guideline-derived decision points for structured dichotomous inquiries, as evidenced by NotebookLM's ability to achieve complete inter-account consistency and to quantitatively increase accuracy. These results are the outcome of workflow-level benchmarking; therefore, clinical utility cannot be inferred solely from them; professional oversight and additional validation remain necessary before any clinical application.
Authors
- Nicolás Dufey-Portilla (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5922-2757)
- Paul Vincent Abbott (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5727-4211)
- Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3783-3156)
- Marc Garcia-Font
- Francesc Abella Sans
- Liran Levin
- Maria Teresa Salagaray
Institutions
- Universidad Andrés Bello (CL)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- University of Sharjah (AE)
- Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (ES)
- Viña del Mar University (CL)
- University of Saskatchewan (CA)
- Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune (IN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Dental Traumatology
- Published
- 2026-03-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.70065
- Primary Topic
- Radiology practices and education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00