If We Build It, Will They Use It? Aligning Resource Recovery Design with Place-Based Social Systems

Recovering water, nutrients, energy, and critical materials from waste streams is essential for building resilient and circular water systems. Yet many recovery technologies fail to achieve adoption or persistence beyond pilot scales because they overlook the social and institutional contexts that shape implementation. This Perspective reframes resource recovery as an adaptive challenge, i.e., one that depends as much on governance capacity, trust, and collective learning as on technical optimization. We propose a watershed- and place-based framework that situates recovery systems within the ecological and institutional boundaries where communities, infrastructure, and governance intersect. Within this discussion, the Community Capitals Framework offers a practical tool to operationalize places and diagnose social readiness by mapping the human, social, financial, and political assets that enable or constrain system adoption. Finally, we highlight the role of the engineer as a boundary spanner, who bridges technical and social domains to coproduce solutions that are legitimate, resilient, and locally grounded. This Perspective advances existing socio-technical approaches by integrating watershed-scale governance, place-based design, and the Community Capitals Framework into a single, operational lens that helps engineers diagnose implementation barriers and intentionally design resource recovery systems for social legitimacy, resilience, and long-term adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Environmental Au
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.5c00266
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

If We Build It, Will They Use It? Aligning Resource Recovery Design with Place-Based Social Systems

Lewis Stetson Rowles, Helen M. Rosko, Matthew R. Landsman, Jayce Sudweeks et al.
ACS Environmental Au
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
article

If We Build It, Will They Use It? Aligning Resource Recovery Design with Place-Based Social Systems

Lewis Stetson Rowles, Helen M. Rosko, Matthew R. Landsman, Jayce Sudweeks, Francisco Cubas
article en

Abstract

Recovering water, nutrients, energy, and critical materials from waste streams is essential for building resilient and circular water systems. Yet many recovery technologies fail to achieve adoption or persistence beyond pilot scales because they overlook the social and institutional contexts that shape implementation. This Perspective reframes resource recovery as an adaptive challenge, i.e., one that depends as much on governance capacity, trust, and collective learning as on technical optimization. We propose a watershed- and place-based framework that situates recovery systems within the ecological and institutional boundaries where communities, infrastructure, and governance intersect. Within this discussion, the Community Capitals Framework offers a practical tool to operationalize places and diagnose social readiness by mapping the human, social, financial, and political assets that enable or constrain system adoption. Finally, we highlight the role of the engineer as a boundary spanner, who bridges technical and social domains to coproduce solutions that are legitimate, resilient, and locally grounded. This Perspective advances existing socio-technical approaches by integrating watershed-scale governance, place-based design, and the Community Capitals Framework into a single, operational lens that helps engineers diagnose implementation barriers and intentionally design resource recovery systems for social legitimacy, resilience, and long-term adoption.

ACS Environmental Au
Public Authority for Applied Education and Training (KW), Georgia Southern University (US), Sustainability Institute (ZA), Department of Chemistry and Earth Sciences (BY), Vibrant Data (United States) (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.