MEDAI-LLM-SUMM: a reporting checklist for medical text summarization studies using large language models
The final MEDAI-LLM-SUMM checklist comprises 24 items organized into six sections: (A) Clinical validity (4 items addressing clinical task definition, expert involvement, hypothesis formulation, and medical expertise requirements); (B) Model Selection (5 items covering model justification, system requirements, deployment environment, LLM-as-judge approach, and prompt documentation); (C) Data (3 items on datasets, reference summaries with expert consensus, and data stratification); (D) Quality Assessment (8 items including evaluation metrics, clinical metrics, expert evaluation, hallucination detection, LLM-judge assessment, sample size justification, pilot testing, and limitations documentation); (E) Safety (2 items on ethical approval and data anonymization); and (F) Data Availability (2 items on code and dataset accessibility). Comparative analysis with six existing reporting standards demonstrated that MEDAI-LLM-SUMM uniquely addresses hallucination assessment requirements, reference summary creation methodology, LLM-as-judge validation protocols, and detailed pilot testing specifications.
Authors
- Kirill M. Arzamasov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7786-0349)
- Olga V. Omelyanskaya (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0245-4431)
- Anton V. Vladzymyrskyy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2990-7736)
- Roman V. Reshetnikov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9661-0254)
- Anna N. Khoruzhaya (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4857-5404)
- Tikhon Burtsev (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9575-8501)
- Ivan A. Blokhin
- Rustam A. Erizhokov
- Mariya R. Kodenko
- Mariya D. Varyukhina
- Yuriy A. Vasilev
- Anastasia P. Pamova
Institutions
- Municipal Budgetary Health care Institution "Clinical and Diagnostic Center" Health (RU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Digital Health
- Published
- 2026-03-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2026.1761601
- Primary Topic
- Topic Modeling
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00