Classification of incidental findings in polytrauma computed tomography

In polytrauma, IFs are as common as trauma-related findings. There is a need for standardized classification. For IFs in WBCT scans, we propose a classification into 5 categories, labeled as IF-RADS 1-5.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights into Imaging
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-026-02229-0
Primary Topic
Abdominal Trauma and Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classification of incidental findings in polytrauma computed tomography

Daniel Vogele, Stefan Reske, Daniela Kildal, Egenrieder Nadine et al.
Insights into Imaging
Abdominal Trauma and Injuries
article

Classification of incidental findings in polytrauma computed tomography

Daniel Vogele, Stefan Reske, Daniela Kildal, Egenrieder Nadine, Beer Meinrad, Rainer Braunschweig
article en

Abstract

In polytrauma, IFs are as common as trauma-related findings. There is a need for standardized classification. For IFs in WBCT scans, we propose a classification into 5 categories, labeled as IF-RADS 1-5.

Insights into ImagingVol. 17(1)
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), University Hospital Ulm (DE), Hôpital du Valais (CH), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Abdominal Trauma and Injuries
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.