FinTech is Dead, Long Live Finance

In this essay I argue that Financial Technology (FinTech) should no longer be taught as a standalone subject in graduate finance programs. A decade ago, dedicated courses made sense when emerging technology use in finance was experimental. Today, it mediates virtually every financial services process, yet curricula maintain an artificial separation that leaves students unprepared for careers where finance and technology are tightly connected. I leverage my experience as a practitioner and educator, designing and teaching FinTech programs since 2016, reviewing program structures at selected business schools, and examining senior finance scholars who already integrate technology into their work. Current university responses typically create separate FinTech degrees rather than integrating technology into core finance courses. I propose a four-step framework for integration: establish financial theory, examine empirical evidence, demonstrate how technology reshapes processes, and explore business model innovations. Team-teaching and professors of practice can address faculty skill gaps. Faculty should adapt courses and institutions need to rethink program structures, moving beyond standalone FinTech offerings toward integration that prepares graduates for finance as it now operates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alternative Finance
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27533743261431316
Primary Topic
Innovations in Educational Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FinTech is Dead, Long Live Finance

Daniel Liebau
Journal of Alternative Finance
Innovations in Educational Methods
article

FinTech is Dead, Long Live Finance

Daniel Liebau
article en

Abstract

In this essay I argue that Financial Technology (FinTech) should no longer be taught as a standalone subject in graduate finance programs. A decade ago, dedicated courses made sense when emerging technology use in finance was experimental. Today, it mediates virtually every financial services process, yet curricula maintain an artificial separation that leaves students unprepared for careers where finance and technology are tightly connected. I leverage my experience as a practitioner and educator, designing and teaching FinTech programs since 2016, reviewing program structures at selected business schools, and examining senior finance scholars who already integrate technology into their work. Current university responses typically create separate FinTech degrees rather than integrating technology into core finance courses. I propose a four-step framework for integration: establish financial theory, examine empirical evidence, demonstrate how technology reshapes processes, and explore business model innovations. Team-teaching and professors of practice can address faculty skill gaps. Faculty should adapt courses and institutions need to rethink program structures, moving beyond standalone FinTech offerings toward integration that prepares graduates for finance as it now operates.

Journal of Alternative Finance
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Innovations in Educational Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

FinTech is Dead, Long Live Finance — Daniel Liebau · Journal of Alternative Finance (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS