Abdominal Imaging Interpretive Errors in a Quality Assurance Database: One Institution’s Experience Over a 5-Year Period
Interpretive error location is significantly associated with patient harm. Our results may inform an evidence-based approach toward improving the process by which errors are reviewed in radiology quality assurance programs. The most reported interpretive error locations in an abdominal imaging quality assurance system are not necessarily the most harmful to patients.
Authors
- Spencer C. Behr (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9400-0543)
- Benjamin M. Yeh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2174-3009)
- Theresia Aschauer
- Michio D. Taya (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7246-378X)
- Javier Villanueva-Meyer
- K. Pallav Kolli
Institutions
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
- Published
- 2026-03-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000001856
- Primary Topic
- Radiology practices and education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00