‘By the king’s suspension, the constitution is violated’: provincial opposition to the revolution of 10 August 1792

Abstract Following the insurrection of 10 August 1792, the Legislative Assembly named commissioners to bring news of the events in Paris to the departments and ensure the loyalty of French armies. This reflected fears that General Lafayette would march his troops on Paris. Such intervention appeared likely given expressions of support for the constitutional monarchy within the departments and the army throughout the summer of 1792. Historians have tended to minimize the significance of provincial opposition to the revolution of 10 August and attribute it to royalism or bourgeois fears of democracy. In contrast, this study argues that moderate revolutionaries’ opposition to Parisian radicalism was based on sincere attachment to the constitution and the liberal revolution it embodied. Although Lafayette’s coup d’état never materialized, evidence of uncertainty and fear in the departments suggest that support for the Constitution of 1791 has been underestimated.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
French History
Published
2026-01-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/fh/crag009
Primary Topic
European Political History Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘By the king’s suspension, the constitution is violated’: provincial opposition to the revolution of 10 August 1792

William S Cormack
French History
European Political History Analysis
article

‘By the king’s suspension, the constitution is violated’: provincial opposition to the revolution of 10 August 1792

William S Cormack
article en

Abstract

Abstract Following the insurrection of 10 August 1792, the Legislative Assembly named commissioners to bring news of the events in Paris to the departments and ensure the loyalty of French armies. This reflected fears that General Lafayette would march his troops on Paris. Such intervention appeared likely given expressions of support for the constitutional monarchy within the departments and the army throughout the summer of 1792. Historians have tended to minimize the significance of provincial opposition to the revolution of 10 August and attribute it to royalism or bourgeois fears of democracy. In contrast, this study argues that moderate revolutionaries’ opposition to Parisian radicalism was based on sincere attachment to the constitution and the liberal revolution it embodied. Although Lafayette’s coup d’état never materialized, evidence of uncertainty and fear in the departments suggest that support for the Constitution of 1791 has been underestimated.

French History
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
European Political History Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘By the king’s suspension, the constitution is violated’: provincial opposition to the revolution of 10 August 1792 — William S Cormack · French History (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS