Writing in innovative learning environments and traditional single teacher classrooms: A New Zealand perspective

Learning to write is a critical skill for students to be successful in secondary and tertiary study. The use of digital technologies to support and enhance writing is now pervasive throughout society. Access to digital resources has been argued as a feature of modern, flexible, innovative learning environments (ILEs). Such ILEs have been a noticeable aspect of new builds (and modifications of built schools) in New Zealand over the last 10–15 years; as well as other countries such as Australia, Italy, and Germany. The architectural design of ILE schools in New Zealand often incorporates large learning spaces that can accommodate anything between 50 and 180 students, with 2 to 6 teachers. Although such spaces are supposed to provide for more modern ways of teaching, concerns have been stated about the quality of teaching and learning in areas such as literacy, particularly due to the negative effect of distractions and noise levels in these ILEs. This article explores the perceptions of New Zealand school principals, middle management and teachers on implementing effective teaching of writing in traditional one-teacher classrooms versus ILEs with multiple teachers. An online questionnaire was distributed via national websites and society/group email addresses that are used by educators. Over 300 responses were made, with 295 of these answering questions related specifically to writing. The research found that there were different views between those who had been working in innovative learning environments for longer lengths of time compared to those in traditional classrooms. Strategies to facilitate improved outcomes in writing were varied across the schooling types. Implication for further research is to fill the ‘black hole’ of research that explores the teaching of writing across the two types of school building types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Research for Policy and Practice
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-026-09415-3
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Writing in innovative learning environments and traditional single teacher classrooms: A New Zealand perspective

Ting Ma, Jo Fletcher, John Everatt
Educational Research for Policy and Practice
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

Writing in innovative learning environments and traditional single teacher classrooms: A New Zealand perspective

Ting Ma, Jo Fletcher, John Everatt
article en

Abstract

Learning to write is a critical skill for students to be successful in secondary and tertiary study. The use of digital technologies to support and enhance writing is now pervasive throughout society. Access to digital resources has been argued as a feature of modern, flexible, innovative learning environments (ILEs). Such ILEs have been a noticeable aspect of new builds (and modifications of built schools) in New Zealand over the last 10–15 years; as well as other countries such as Australia, Italy, and Germany. The architectural design of ILE schools in New Zealand often incorporates large learning spaces that can accommodate anything between 50 and 180 students, with 2 to 6 teachers. Although such spaces are supposed to provide for more modern ways of teaching, concerns have been stated about the quality of teaching and learning in areas such as literacy, particularly due to the negative effect of distractions and noise levels in these ILEs. This article explores the perceptions of New Zealand school principals, middle management and teachers on implementing effective teaching of writing in traditional one-teacher classrooms versus ILEs with multiple teachers. An online questionnaire was distributed via national websites and society/group email addresses that are used by educators. Over 300 responses were made, with 295 of these answering questions related specifically to writing. The research found that there were different views between those who had been working in innovative learning environments for longer lengths of time compared to those in traditional classrooms. Strategies to facilitate improved outcomes in writing were varied across the schooling types. Implication for further research is to fill the ‘black hole’ of research that explores the teaching of writing across the two types of school building types.

Educational Research for Policy and Practice
University of Canterbury (NZ)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Writing in innovative learning environments and traditional single teacher classrooms: A New Zealand perspective — Ting Ma, Jo Fletcher, et al. · Educational Research for Policy and Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS