From Reproduction to Licensing: Applying Article 15 CDSMD to the Process of Generative AI Training

As Generative AI becomes central to the digital landscape, its reliance on vast datasets – often sourced from publicly available press publications – raises pressing legal questions concerning intellectual property (IP) rights. This article examines whether the use of such content for training AI systems may infringe Article 15 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive (CDSMD), a provision originally intended to regulate unlicensed uses by news aggregators and search engines. It explores the legal implications of using press content at scale for training purposes – typically without attribution, remuneration, or a clear legal basis – and identifies the specific stages of the training process where reproduction rights may be implicated. A central issue is the scope of the press publishers’ right (PPR), particularly the distinction between protected editorial content and unprotected “mere facts”. To support this analysis, the article develops a test for assessing whether a given use constitutes infringing reproduction under Article 15 CDSMD. It further argues that, where training uses qualify as infringing, collective licensing could offer a pragmatic solution – ensuring legal certainty for developers, fair compensation for publishers, and fostering a sustainable and pluralistic digital information ecosystem.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53292/c31b2d64.c30366a4
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Reproduction to Licensing: Applying Article 15 CDSMD to the Process of Generative AI Training

Klara Schinzler
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

From Reproduction to Licensing: Applying Article 15 CDSMD to the Process of Generative AI Training

Klara Schinzler
article en

Abstract

As Generative AI becomes central to the digital landscape, its reliance on vast datasets – often sourced from publicly available press publications – raises pressing legal questions concerning intellectual property (IP) rights. This article examines whether the use of such content for training AI systems may infringe Article 15 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive (CDSMD), a provision originally intended to regulate unlicensed uses by news aggregators and search engines. It explores the legal implications of using press content at scale for training purposes – typically without attribution, remuneration, or a clear legal basis – and identifies the specific stages of the training process where reproduction rights may be implicated. A central issue is the scope of the press publishers’ right (PPR), particularly the distinction between protected editorial content and unprotected “mere facts”. To support this analysis, the article develops a test for assessing whether a given use constitutes infringing reproduction under Article 15 CDSMD. It further argues that, where training uses qualify as infringing, collective licensing could offer a pragmatic solution – ensuring legal certainty for developers, fair compensation for publishers, and fostering a sustainable and pluralistic digital information ecosystem.

(2025 1)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.