Deadlock at INC-5.2: Understanding the Blocked Progress of the Global Plastics Treaty Negotiations

This article highlights the disagreement at the Global Plastics Treaty negotiations, underscoring how geopolitical divisions, industry lobbyists, and consensus-based procedures hinder international cooperation to address plastic pollution.By examining the reasons behind the deadlock and outlining pathways forward, the paper provides critical insights for policymakers, negotiators, and civil society actors striving to advance global environmental governance.The analysis contributes to shaping future treaty processes, supports evidence-based policy design, and reinforces the urgency of embedding equity and just transition principles.Its impact extends beyond academia by informing international organisations, regional initiatives, and grassroots movements working toward ambitious, science-driven solutions to the plastics crisis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cambridge Prisms Plastics
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/plc.2026.10044
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deadlock at INC-5.2: Understanding the Blocked Progress of the Global Plastics Treaty Negotiations

Tony R Walker, Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre
Cambridge Prisms Plastics
World Trade Organization Law
article

Deadlock at INC-5.2: Understanding the Blocked Progress of the Global Plastics Treaty Negotiations

Tony R Walker, Gabriel Enrique De-la-Torre
article en

Abstract

This article highlights the disagreement at the Global Plastics Treaty negotiations, underscoring how geopolitical divisions, industry lobbyists, and consensus-based procedures hinder international cooperation to address plastic pollution.By examining the reasons behind the deadlock and outlining pathways forward, the paper provides critical insights for policymakers, negotiators, and civil society actors striving to advance global environmental governance.The analysis contributes to shaping future treaty processes, supports evidence-based policy design, and reinforces the urgency of embedding equity and just transition principles.Its impact extends beyond academia by informing international organisations, regional initiatives, and grassroots movements working toward ambitious, science-driven solutions to the plastics crisis.

Cambridge Prisms Plastics
University of Cambridge
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
World Trade Organization Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.