Silencing Conversations: The Flawed Logic of Limiting Gender Interactions in Schools

The practice of restricting interactions between male and female students within educational institutions, despite their co-educational nature, presents a significant challenge to the holistic development of individuals. This paper argues that such limitations imposed by schools and colleges are deeply flawed, constituting a violation of the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression enshrined under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. Beyond the curtailment of fundamental rights, these restrictions hinder students' social development, communication skills, emotional intelligence, and their preparation for future personal and professional relationships in a gender-integrated world. Through a combination of doctrinal legal research, socio-legal analysis of academic literature, and a critical evaluation of institutional justifications, this paper demonstrates the detrimental effects of limiting gender interactions. It further proposes recommendations for fostering healthy and respectful gender interactions within educational settings to ensure the comprehensive development and constitutional rights of all students are upheld

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18832257
Primary Topic
Legal Issues in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Silencing Conversations: The Flawed Logic of Limiting Gender Interactions in Schools

Abraham S., Yogitha S.S
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Legal Issues in Education
article

Silencing Conversations: The Flawed Logic of Limiting Gender Interactions in Schools

Abraham S., Yogitha S.S
article en

Abstract

The practice of restricting interactions between male and female students within educational institutions, despite their co-educational nature, presents a significant challenge to the holistic development of individuals. This paper argues that such limitations imposed by schools and colleges are deeply flawed, constituting a violation of the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression enshrined under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. Beyond the curtailment of fundamental rights, these restrictions hinder students' social development, communication skills, emotional intelligence, and their preparation for future personal and professional relationships in a gender-integrated world. Through a combination of doctrinal legal research, socio-legal analysis of academic literature, and a critical evaluation of institutional justifications, this paper demonstrates the detrimental effects of limiting gender interactions. It further proposes recommendations for fostering healthy and respectful gender interactions within educational settings to ensure the comprehensive development and constitutional rights of all students are upheld

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Legal Issues in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Silencing Conversations: The Flawed Logic of Limiting Gender Interactions in Schools — Abraham S., Yogitha S.S · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS