Uneven distribution of knowledge seeking for female researchers

As academic knowledge exchange increasingly shifts to online platforms, understanding the dynamics of knowledge-seeking behaviors is essential for fostering inclusive and effective digital communities. This study investigates knowledge-seeking behaviors on academic question-and-answer (Q&A) platforms, focusing on how regional and gender identities shape topic selection and engagement. Findings indicate that gender-based knowledge disparities exhibit both regional-specific characteristics and global patterns. Female researchers are more active than male counterparts in seeking knowledge online, with significant regional disparities in their areas of inquiry. Despite their participation in specific topics, specifically technical topics in Life Science & Biomedicine field, females report lower levels of expertise and receive less assistance in these topics. This study contributes a nuanced view of global and gender-based knowledge disparities, underscoring the need for targeted strategies to enhance support for underrepresented groups within academic knowledge exchange.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Complexity
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44260-025-00067-7
Primary Topic
Expert finding and Q&A systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uneven distribution of knowledge seeking for female researchers

Dongyi Wang, Jianhua Hou, Shiqi Tang, Yi Bu
npj Complexity
Expert finding and Q&A systems
article

Uneven distribution of knowledge seeking for female researchers

Dongyi Wang, Jianhua Hou, Shiqi Tang, Yi Bu
article en

Abstract

As academic knowledge exchange increasingly shifts to online platforms, understanding the dynamics of knowledge-seeking behaviors is essential for fostering inclusive and effective digital communities. This study investigates knowledge-seeking behaviors on academic question-and-answer (Q&A) platforms, focusing on how regional and gender identities shape topic selection and engagement. Findings indicate that gender-based knowledge disparities exhibit both regional-specific characteristics and global patterns. Female researchers are more active than male counterparts in seeking knowledge online, with significant regional disparities in their areas of inquiry. Despite their participation in specific topics, specifically technical topics in Life Science & Biomedicine field, females report lower levels of expertise and receive less assistance in these topics. This study contributes a nuanced view of global and gender-based knowledge disparities, underscoring the need for targeted strategies to enhance support for underrepresented groups within academic knowledge exchange.

npj ComplexityVol. 3(1)
Leiden University (NL), Carter Center (US), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Peking University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Expert finding and Q&A systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Uneven distribution of knowledge seeking for female researchers — Dongyi Wang, Jianhua Hou, et al. · npj Complexity (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS