Ethics Submission and Review Guide - CT:IQ and ARDC Clinical Research Data Sharing Frameworks Project

The Ethics Submission and Review Guide offers more detailed guidance for researchers preparing to submit a data sharing project to an ethics review body including a Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC). It supports both researchers and ethics review body members in understanding the ethical considerations specific to data sharing, including the application of the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. This guide complements the findings of the Ethics Review Body Benchmarking Exercise Report, which identified areas of variation across ethics review bodies and informed the development of this resource. Recommended for: Researchers submitting data sharing projects for ethics review and members of ethics review bodies. About the project: The CT:IQ and ARDC Clinical Research Data Sharing Frameworks Project supports the responsible and effective sharing of clinical research data in Australia. These resources have been developed in collaboration with sector partners to guide researchers, institutions, ethics review bodies and others in navigating the ethical, governance, and operational considerations of data sharing. Acknowledgement Clinical Research Data Sharing Frameworks is a co-investment partnership with the Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) through the People Research Data Commons (DOI: 10.3565/655K-7H05). The ARDC is enabled by the Australian Government’s National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18794178
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethics Submission and Review Guide - CT:IQ and ARDC Clinical Research Data Sharing Frameworks Project

Australian Research Data Commons, James Scheibner, Lisa Eckstein
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Ethics Submission and Review Guide - CT:IQ and ARDC Clinical Research Data Sharing Frameworks Project

Australian Research Data Commons, James Scheibner, Lisa Eckstein
article en

Abstract

The Ethics Submission and Review Guide offers more detailed guidance for researchers preparing to submit a data sharing project to an ethics review body including a Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC). It supports both researchers and ethics review body members in understanding the ethical considerations specific to data sharing, including the application of the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. This guide complements the findings of the Ethics Review Body Benchmarking Exercise Report, which identified areas of variation across ethics review bodies and informed the development of this resource. Recommended for: Researchers submitting data sharing projects for ethics review and members of ethics review bodies. About the project: The CT:IQ and ARDC Clinical Research Data Sharing Frameworks Project supports the responsible and effective sharing of clinical research data in Australia. These resources have been developed in collaboration with sector partners to guide researchers, institutions, ethics review bodies and others in navigating the ethical, governance, and operational considerations of data sharing. Acknowledgement Clinical Research Data Sharing Frameworks is a co-investment partnership with the Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) through the People Research Data Commons (DOI: 10.3565/655K-7H05). The ARDC is enabled by the Australian Government’s National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Tasmania (AU), Flinders University (AU), IQ Samhällsbyggnad (SE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.