Motus Internus: Narrative Turning Points and the Intragroup Emergence of Dehumanizing Ideologies Among Migrants

This article explores how forced migrants in Italy come to adopt morally distancing and dehumanizing views toward fellow migrants, and how these ideological shifts are narratively justified through turning points. Drawing on longitudinal narrative interviews with 52 forced migrants in Italy conducted over six years (2019–2025), the study analyzes how moments of rupture — relational, institutional, aspirational, and symbolic — prompt migrants to reorganize moral evaluations and redefine group boundaries. Through a typology of corrective, disillusioning, and liberating turning points, the article shows how migrants reposition themselves in response to betrayal, exclusion, or the desire for civic recognition. Dehumanization emerges as a discursive strategy for asserting dignity and legitimacy under precarious conditions, rather than as a mere rhetorical excess. The study contributes to research on narrative, ideology, and migrant integration, and highlights the need for policy approaches that address the relational and moral dimensions of belonging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Migration Review
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183261427389
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motus Internus: Narrative Turning Points and the Intragroup Emergence of Dehumanizing Ideologies Among Migrants

Fabio Indìo Massimo Poppi
International Migration Review
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Motus Internus: Narrative Turning Points and the Intragroup Emergence of Dehumanizing Ideologies Among Migrants

Fabio Indìo Massimo Poppi
article en

Abstract

This article explores how forced migrants in Italy come to adopt morally distancing and dehumanizing views toward fellow migrants, and how these ideological shifts are narratively justified through turning points. Drawing on longitudinal narrative interviews with 52 forced migrants in Italy conducted over six years (2019–2025), the study analyzes how moments of rupture — relational, institutional, aspirational, and symbolic — prompt migrants to reorganize moral evaluations and redefine group boundaries. Through a typology of corrective, disillusioning, and liberating turning points, the article shows how migrants reposition themselves in response to betrayal, exclusion, or the desire for civic recognition. Dehumanization emerges as a discursive strategy for asserting dignity and legitimacy under precarious conditions, rather than as a mere rhetorical excess. The study contributes to research on narrative, ideology, and migrant integration, and highlights the need for policy approaches that address the relational and moral dimensions of belonging.

International Migration Review
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (LT), University of Łódź (PL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Motus Internus: Narrative Turning Points and the Intragroup Emergence of Dehumanizing Ideologies Among Migrants — Fabio Indìo Massimo Poppi · International Migration Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS