Vacuum-assisted excision followed by minimal access surgery for a large fibroadenoma: lessons from a hybrid approach – a case report

Introduction: Vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) are minimally invasive alternatives to surgery for the treatment of breast fibroadenomas. While both methods are effective in selected cases, their utility in managing large fibroadenomas remains uncertain. This report highlights a case where both HIFU and VAE failed to achieve adequate treatment of a giant fibroadenoma, necessitating surgical excision. Presentation of Case: A 17-year-old girl patient presented with a large, palpable, mobile mass in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast, measuring approximately 9 × 8 cm on ultrasound. HIFU treatment performed several years prior failed to reduce the lesion’s volume or relieve symptoms. VAE using the Brevera system (9-G, 20-mm aperture needle) was attempted, with 10 aspiration cycles and 120 tissue cores obtained. Post-procedural imaging showed only 15–20% volume reduction. Due to insufficient shrinkage, complete excision was performed through a periareolar incision. The postoperative course was uneventful, with good cosmetic outcome. Discussion: This case demonstrates the limitations of HIFU and VAE in the treatment of large, fibrotic fibroadenomas. While VAE failed to achieve full excision, the partial debulking allowed for a smaller, more aesthetic surgical approach. The sequential use of VAE followed by limited open excision may be considered in select patients to optimize cosmetic outcomes. Conclusion: VAE is a well-established, minimally invasive option for the management of small to medium-sized fibroadenomas. However, its effectiveness in lesions exceeding 3–4 cm is limited. This case highlights the potential role of VAE as an adjunctive tool in selected cases of large fibroadenomas, where volume reduction can optimize less invasive surgical approaches. Careful patient selection remains critical to procedural success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/rc9.0000000000000245
Primary Topic
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vacuum-assisted excision followed by minimal access surgery for a large fibroadenoma: lessons from a hybrid approach – a case report

Dobromir Dimitrov, Meri Shoshkova, Martin Karamanliev, Stefka Petrova
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
article

Vacuum-assisted excision followed by minimal access surgery for a large fibroadenoma: lessons from a hybrid approach – a case report

Dobromir Dimitrov, Meri Shoshkova, Martin Karamanliev, Stefka Petrova
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) are minimally invasive alternatives to surgery for the treatment of breast fibroadenomas. While both methods are effective in selected cases, their utility in managing large fibroadenomas remains uncertain. This report highlights a case where both HIFU and VAE failed to achieve adequate treatment of a giant fibroadenoma, necessitating surgical excision. Presentation of Case: A 17-year-old girl patient presented with a large, palpable, mobile mass in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast, measuring approximately 9 × 8 cm on ultrasound. HIFU treatment performed several years prior failed to reduce the lesion’s volume or relieve symptoms. VAE using the Brevera system (9-G, 20-mm aperture needle) was attempted, with 10 aspiration cycles and 120 tissue cores obtained. Post-procedural imaging showed only 15–20% volume reduction. Due to insufficient shrinkage, complete excision was performed through a periareolar incision. The postoperative course was uneventful, with good cosmetic outcome. Discussion: This case demonstrates the limitations of HIFU and VAE in the treatment of large, fibrotic fibroadenomas. While VAE failed to achieve full excision, the partial debulking allowed for a smaller, more aesthetic surgical approach. The sequential use of VAE followed by limited open excision may be considered in select patients to optimize cosmetic outcomes. Conclusion: VAE is a well-established, minimally invasive option for the management of small to medium-sized fibroadenomas. However, its effectiveness in lesions exceeding 3–4 cm is limited. This case highlights the potential role of VAE as an adjunctive tool in selected cases of large fibroadenomas, where volume reduction can optimize less invasive surgical approaches. Careful patient selection remains critical to procedural success.

International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
University Hospital Dr. Georgi Stranski (BG), Center for Special Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.