Tomographic biomarkers differ by progression risk to late macular degeneration.

Progression to late AMD phenotypes was different for HRF and SDD. HRF increased risk of progression to FoA with or without nAMD, whereas SDD to FoA only, suggesting distinct biological pathways driving divergent disease outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/95864
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tomographic biomarkers differ by progression risk to late macular degeneration.

Ruth E. Hogg, Enrico Bernardi, Lajos Csincsik, Martin Sebastian Zinkernagel et al.
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Tomographic biomarkers differ by progression risk to late macular degeneration.

Ruth E. Hogg, Enrico Bernardi, Lajos Csincsik, Martin Sebastian Zinkernagel, Tunde Peto, Katherine A Muldrew, David M Wright, Usha Chakravarthy
article en

Abstract

Progression to late AMD phenotypes was different for HRF and SDD. HRF increased risk of progression to FoA with or without nAMD, whereas SDD to FoA only, suggesting distinct biological pathways driving divergent disease outcomes.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Ophthalmology Clinic (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.