Do congruency effects in Navon’s and Stroop’s paradigms reflect the same (control) mechanisms? A conceptual analysis and an empirical test.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Review
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000617
Primary Topic
Psychological Testing and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do congruency effects in Navon’s and Stroop’s paradigms reflect the same (control) mechanisms? A conceptual analysis and an empirical test.

Christian Gerlach, Nicolas Poirel
Psychological Review
Psychological Testing and Assessment
article

Do congruency effects in Navon’s and Stroop’s paradigms reflect the same (control) mechanisms? A conceptual analysis and an empirical test.

Christian Gerlach, Nicolas Poirel
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Psychological Review
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod (FR), Aalborg University (DK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Psychological Testing and Assessment
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do congruency effects in Navon’s and Stroop’s paradigms reflect the same (control) mechanisms? A conceptual analysis and an empirical test. — Christian Gerlach, Nicolas Poirel · Psychological Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS