Mainstreaming vs. normalisation: Towards more conceptual clarity on how mainstream parties legitimise the far right

Abstract The far right is becoming increasingly established worldwide and is now in its ‘fourth wave’, characterised by its mainstreaming and normalisation . Although more and more political science research focuses on these processes, we argue that this literature lacks conceptual clarity about what these terms mean, which actors are involved, and what effects these processes have. This article has two aims. First, we describe how mainstreaming and normalisation have been conceptualised and analysed in the existing literature. Building on this, we then introduce a conceptual framework for future empirical research and discuss three research avenues: more precise operationalisations of the mainstream/normal and non-mainstream/abnormal, more refined theories about different political actors, and a broader analytical perspective beyond immigration issues and national-level dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Political Research
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1475676526100887
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
64.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mainstreaming vs. normalisation: Towards more conceptual clarity on how mainstream parties legitimise the far right

Gefjon Off, Anna-Sophie Heinze
1 citations
European Journal of Political Research
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
64.82
article

Mainstreaming vs. normalisation: Towards more conceptual clarity on how mainstream parties legitimise the far right

Gefjon Off, Anna-Sophie Heinze
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The far right is becoming increasingly established worldwide and is now in its ‘fourth wave’, characterised by its mainstreaming and normalisation . Although more and more political science research focuses on these processes, we argue that this literature lacks conceptual clarity about what these terms mean, which actors are involved, and what effects these processes have. This article has two aims. First, we describe how mainstreaming and normalisation have been conceptualised and analysed in the existing literature. Building on this, we then introduce a conceptual framework for future empirical research and discuss three research avenues: more precise operationalisations of the mainstream/normal and non-mainstream/abnormal, more refined theories about different political actors, and a broader analytical perspective beyond immigration issues and national-level dynamics.

European Journal of Political Research
Universität Hamburg (DE), Universität Trier (DE)
Volkswagen Foundation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
64.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mainstreaming vs. normalisation: Towards more conceptual clarity on how mainstream parties legitimise the far right — Gefjon Off, Anna-Sophie Heinze · European Journal of Political Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS