Risk assessment of endocrine disruptors: Does unresolved uncertainties require extra precaution?

Minimising exposure to endocrine disruptors (EDs) is a priority within the European Union's political agenda. These chemical substances interfere with the endocrine system, leading to adverse effects on human health and the environment. Despite extensive research, significant uncertainties remain regarding safe levels of exposure to EDs. This paper highlights the need for cautious risk assessment due to substantial knowledge gaps, limitations in testing and unresolved questions about thresholds, non-monotonic dose-responses and low-dose effects. On this basis, we recommend a precautionary approach to risk assessment of EDs and in general support initiatives to reduce exposure by phasing out use and production. In cases where EDs are found in for instance food and drinking water, we propose the use of an additional uncertainty factor of 10 (as default) for the nature of ED effects to ensure more protective risk assessments. Our recommendations aim to contribute to the ongoing discussion on how to effectively manage the risks associated with endocrine disruptors. • There is a growing need for risk assessment of endocrine disruptors (EDs) • Significant uncertainties remain in deriving safe levels of exposure to EDs • Uncertainties include major knowledge gaps, testing limitations, questions around thresholds, and potential for non-monotonic and low-dose effects • Applying an additional uncertainty factor of 10 for ED effects is recommended as a pragmatic precautionary approach

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Toxicology
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cotox.2026.100576
Primary Topic
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk assessment of endocrine disruptors: Does unresolved uncertainties require extra precaution?

A. Beronius, Marie Louise Holmer, Marta Axelstad, Terje Svingen et al.
Current Opinion in Toxicology
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
article

Risk assessment of endocrine disruptors: Does unresolved uncertainties require extra precaution?

A. Beronius, Marie Louise Holmer, Marta Axelstad, Terje Svingen, Cecile Michel-Caillet
article en

Abstract

Minimising exposure to endocrine disruptors (EDs) is a priority within the European Union's political agenda. These chemical substances interfere with the endocrine system, leading to adverse effects on human health and the environment. Despite extensive research, significant uncertainties remain regarding safe levels of exposure to EDs. This paper highlights the need for cautious risk assessment due to substantial knowledge gaps, limitations in testing and unresolved questions about thresholds, non-monotonic dose-responses and low-dose effects. On this basis, we recommend a precautionary approach to risk assessment of EDs and in general support initiatives to reduce exposure by phasing out use and production. In cases where EDs are found in for instance food and drinking water, we propose the use of an additional uncertainty factor of 10 (as default) for the nature of ED effects to ensure more protective risk assessments. Our recommendations aim to contribute to the ongoing discussion on how to effectively manage the risks associated with endocrine disruptors. • There is a growing need for risk assessment of endocrine disruptors (EDs) • Significant uncertainties remain in deriving safe levels of exposure to EDs • Uncertainties include major knowledge gaps, testing limitations, questions around thresholds, and potential for non-monotonic and low-dose effects • Applying an additional uncertainty factor of 10 for ED effects is recommended as a pragmatic precautionary approach

Current Opinion in ToxicologyVol. 46
Karolinska Institutet (SE), Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail (FR), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.