Perspectives on variability of in vivo toxicology studies: considerations for next-generation toxicology

While any test system will have inherent variability, understanding its sources and impact on study interpretation will help ensure that appropriate confidence is applied when using the test method. Furthermore, such information aids in establishing relevant metrics to serve as baselines for informing performance characterization of new approach methodologies (NAMs). Future evaluation of NAMs should be contextualized using estimates of uncertainty and variance of the traditional study data to demonstrate "better" performance compared to traditional testing approaches. Robust understanding of guideline study performance is important for risk assessments, where it is important to find species-relevant NAMs that can perform at least as well as existing bioassays.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Toxicology
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2026.1778353
Primary Topic
Animal testing and alternatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives on variability of in vivo toxicology studies: considerations for next-generation toxicology

Emily N. Reinke, Agnes L. Karmaus, Helena T. Högberg, Nicole Kleinstreuer et al.
Frontiers in Toxicology
Animal testing and alternatives
article

Perspectives on variability of in vivo toxicology studies: considerations for next-generation toxicology

Emily N. Reinke, Agnes L. Karmaus, Helena T. Högberg, Nicole Kleinstreuer, Anna Kreutz, Oluwakemi Oyetade, David Allen
article en

Abstract

While any test system will have inherent variability, understanding its sources and impact on study interpretation will help ensure that appropriate confidence is applied when using the test method. Furthermore, such information aids in establishing relevant metrics to serve as baselines for informing performance characterization of new approach methodologies (NAMs). Future evaluation of NAMs should be contextualized using estimates of uncertainty and variance of the traditional study data to demonstrate "better" performance compared to traditional testing approaches. Robust understanding of guideline study performance is important for risk assessments, where it is important to find species-relevant NAMs that can perform at least as well as existing bioassays.

Frontiers in ToxicologyVol. 8
Research Triangle Park Foundation (US), Innsbruck Medical University (AT), Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (US)
Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Universität Innsbruck, National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Animal testing and alternatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.