Interface Hierarchy and the Legitimacy of Global Training Time: A Convex Multi-Channel Stress Test

This technical note presents a minimal convex stress test demonstrating that global training time in multi-channel optimization systems is protocol-dependent rather than intrinsic. We consider a strictly convex three-channel quadratic system with a unique global minimum shared across all interface scheduling protocols. Despite identical objective function and minimizer, convergence time varies by up to an order of magnitude depending on interface hierarchy and activation sequence. In certain cyclic hierarchical regimes, global closure fails entirely within finite horizon despite convexity and uniqueness of the solution. We introduce a diagnostic perspective in which temporal metrics (such as time-to-hit and integrated excess loss) are interpreted as closure-dependent functionals rather than intrinsic scalars of the objective landscape. The results suggest that convergence time in multi-interface systems must be evaluated relative to interface hierarchy, even in strictly convex settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18836862
Primary Topic
Real-Time Systems Scheduling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interface Hierarchy and the Legitimacy of Global Training Time: A Convex Multi-Channel Stress Test

Danilo Tavella
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Real-Time Systems Scheduling
article

Interface Hierarchy and the Legitimacy of Global Training Time: A Convex Multi-Channel Stress Test

Danilo Tavella
article en

Abstract

This technical note presents a minimal convex stress test demonstrating that global training time in multi-channel optimization systems is protocol-dependent rather than intrinsic. We consider a strictly convex three-channel quadratic system with a unique global minimum shared across all interface scheduling protocols. Despite identical objective function and minimizer, convergence time varies by up to an order of magnitude depending on interface hierarchy and activation sequence. In certain cyclic hierarchical regimes, global closure fails entirely within finite horizon despite convexity and uniqueness of the solution. We introduce a diagnostic perspective in which temporal metrics (such as time-to-hit and integrated excess loss) are interpreted as closure-dependent functionals rather than intrinsic scalars of the objective landscape. The results suggest that convergence time in multi-interface systems must be evaluated relative to interface hierarchy, even in strictly convex settings.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Real-Time Systems Scheduling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.