Trends in cannabis urine drug screen testing in Colorado’s largest health system: a retrospective cohort study

Colorado was the first state in the United States to legalize recreational cannabis, which provides a unique opportunity to evaluate cannabis urine drug screen (UDS) testing trends in a large healthcare system in response to that policy. This study examined how testing rates and positivity evolved over time and whether testing patterns varied by demographic factors. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed all University of Colorado Health visits from 2008 to 2022 using electronic medical record data. We assessed group comparisons with Chi-squared tests and t-tests and demographic predictors of UDS testing using multivariable log binomial models. From 2008 to 2022, the positivity rate for cannabis among UDSs rose from 14% in 2008 to 30% in 2015, then plateaued. The proportion of visits with cannabis testing declined from 0.25% to 0.04%. Younger patients, males, and individuals identifying as Black, Hispanic, or American Indian were more likely to be tested than their counterparts, with notable racial and ethnic disparities. Despite rising cannabis positivity rates, testing frequency declined. Persistent demographic disparities in testing raise concerns about potential bias, especially in the absence of documented differences in use across groups. Future work should examine indications for cannabis urine drug screen testing and how results influence clinical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cannabis Research
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-026-00418-8
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trends in cannabis urine drug screen testing in Colorado’s largest health system: a retrospective cohort study

Colleen K. McIlvennan, Larry A. Allen, Laura Helmkamp, Robert L. Page et al.
Journal of Cannabis Research
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
article

Trends in cannabis urine drug screen testing in Colorado’s largest health system: a retrospective cohort study

Colleen K. McIlvennan, Larry A. Allen, Laura Helmkamp, Robert L. Page, Brock J. Gilsdorf
article en

Abstract

Colorado was the first state in the United States to legalize recreational cannabis, which provides a unique opportunity to evaluate cannabis urine drug screen (UDS) testing trends in a large healthcare system in response to that policy. This study examined how testing rates and positivity evolved over time and whether testing patterns varied by demographic factors. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed all University of Colorado Health visits from 2008 to 2022 using electronic medical record data. We assessed group comparisons with Chi-squared tests and t-tests and demographic predictors of UDS testing using multivariable log binomial models. From 2008 to 2022, the positivity rate for cannabis among UDSs rose from 14% in 2008 to 30% in 2015, then plateaued. The proportion of visits with cannabis testing declined from 0.25% to 0.04%. Younger patients, males, and individuals identifying as Black, Hispanic, or American Indian were more likely to be tested than their counterparts, with notable racial and ethnic disparities. Despite rising cannabis positivity rates, testing frequency declined. Persistent demographic disparities in testing raise concerns about potential bias, especially in the absence of documented differences in use across groups. Future work should examine indications for cannabis urine drug screen testing and how results influence clinical care.

Journal of Cannabis Research
Outcomes Research Consortium (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.