The Varieties of Masturbatory Experience: Prevalences in a U.S. National Sample and Recommendations for Future Investigations

Masturbation is prevalent across age groups. Yet, for how common it is, the literature on masturbation is very underdeveloped. A fundamental problem in past studies is a lack of careful operationalization of masturbation, and in turn, surveys that provide participants vague, confounded, or no definition of masturbation at all. To illustrate the wide range of different behaviors likely captured by past studies, we identified and precisely defined nine distinct masturbatory behaviors occurring in various contexts (solo, partnered, and group; with others in person or via remote connection). Using a large U.S. national dataset weighted to reflect key demographics (<i>N</i> = 3,423 adults), we found that, in terms of last-month engagement, some of these behaviors were very common, e.g., solo masturbation (59.4% of women, 76.7% of men), others were somewhat common, e.g., masturbation during partnered sex (24.3% of women, 26.5% of men), and some were rare, e.g., group masturbation (2.3% of women, 3.6% of men). Our goal is to highlight the importance of carefully operationalizing and defining masturbation in research designs and to strengthen the rigor of masturbation research more generally. Implications for understanding masturbation in terms models of sexual response, relationships, clinical practice, and education are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2026.2628649
Primary Topic
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Varieties of Masturbatory Experience: Prevalences in a U.S. National Sample and Recommendations for Future Investigations

Heather Hoffmann, Neil Gleason, Jessie VanNess Ford, Michael P. Moore et al.
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
article

The Varieties of Masturbatory Experience: Prevalences in a U.S. National Sample and Recommendations for Future Investigations

Heather Hoffmann, Neil Gleason, Jessie VanNess Ford, Michael P. Moore, Nantje Fischer, Maximiliane Uhlich, David De Jong, Andrew Baker, Ryan L. Rahm-Knigge, Eli Coleman, Christopher Ginn
article en

Abstract

Masturbation is prevalent across age groups. Yet, for how common it is, the literature on masturbation is very underdeveloped. A fundamental problem in past studies is a lack of careful operationalization of masturbation, and in turn, surveys that provide participants vague, confounded, or no definition of masturbation at all. To illustrate the wide range of different behaviors likely captured by past studies, we identified and precisely defined nine distinct masturbatory behaviors occurring in various contexts (solo, partnered, and group; with others in person or via remote connection). Using a large U.S. national dataset weighted to reflect key demographics (<i>N</i> = 3,423 adults), we found that, in terms of last-month engagement, some of these behaviors were very common, e.g., solo masturbation (59.4% of women, 76.7% of men), others were somewhat common, e.g., masturbation during partnered sex (24.3% of women, 26.5% of men), and some were rare, e.g., group masturbation (2.3% of women, 3.6% of men). Our goal is to highlight the importance of carefully operationalizing and defining masturbation in research designs and to strengthen the rigor of masturbation research more generally. Implications for understanding masturbation in terms models of sexual response, relationships, clinical practice, and education are discussed.

Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
Western Carolina University (US), University of Southern California (US), University of Oslo (NO), University of Basel (CH), Institute for Community Health (US), Knox College (US), Columbia University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.