German-language adaptation of the Bereavement Risk Assessment Tool (BRAT): findings on the inter-rater reliability

Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) affects approximately 10% of the bereaved adults, with prevalence rates in Germany ranging between 4.7–5.4%. Early identification through pre-death risk assessment is crucial for optimal bereavement care, yet no validated German-language instrument exists. The Bereavement Risk Assessment Tool (BRAT) represents a promising solution but requires cultural adaptation and validation. The aim of this study was to adapt the BRAT for German-speaking countries and evaluate its inter-rater reliability among healthcare professionals in palliative care and hospice settings. A cross-sectional reliability study was conducted online. The BRAT was translated into German using forward and backward translation methodology, resulting in the Multiprofessioneller Fragebogen zur Trauerverarbeitung (MFT). Participants evaluated four case vignettes featuring 10 bereaved family members using the 40-item MFT. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Gwet's AC and Krippendorff's α across multiple risk categorizations. A total of 55 healthcare professionals (78.2% female, M = 51.5 years) working in German palliative care and hospice settings were recruited. Participants included diverse professional groups: nursing staff, pastoral care workers, medical doctors, psychologists, and social workers. The MFT demonstrated good to excellent inter-rater reliability across most items. The majority of items showed good to almost perfect agreement between raters. Notable variations emerged between professional groups, with inter-rater reliability being influenced by the number of response categories used for risk assessment. The German adaptation represents a reliable tool for pre-death bereavement risk assessment in German-speaking healthcare settings. Profession-specific training programs may enhance consistency across occupational groups. Further validation studies examining predictive validity for PGD outcomes are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Palliative Care
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-026-02033-z
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

German-language adaptation of the Bereavement Risk Assessment Tool (BRAT): findings on the inter-rater reliability

Daniel P. Berthold, Stephan Bongard, Bastian Eul, Heidi Müller et al.
BMC Palliative Care
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
article

German-language adaptation of the Bereavement Risk Assessment Tool (BRAT): findings on the inter-rater reliability

Daniel P. Berthold, Stephan Bongard, Bastian Eul, Heidi Müller, Kristina Klug, U Sibelius, Tatjana Huys
article en

Abstract

Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) affects approximately 10% of the bereaved adults, with prevalence rates in Germany ranging between 4.7–5.4%. Early identification through pre-death risk assessment is crucial for optimal bereavement care, yet no validated German-language instrument exists. The Bereavement Risk Assessment Tool (BRAT) represents a promising solution but requires cultural adaptation and validation. The aim of this study was to adapt the BRAT for German-speaking countries and evaluate its inter-rater reliability among healthcare professionals in palliative care and hospice settings. A cross-sectional reliability study was conducted online. The BRAT was translated into German using forward and backward translation methodology, resulting in the Multiprofessioneller Fragebogen zur Trauerverarbeitung (MFT). Participants evaluated four case vignettes featuring 10 bereaved family members using the 40-item MFT. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Gwet's AC and Krippendorff's α across multiple risk categorizations. A total of 55 healthcare professionals (78.2% female, M = 51.5 years) working in German palliative care and hospice settings were recruited. Participants included diverse professional groups: nursing staff, pastoral care workers, medical doctors, psychologists, and social workers. The MFT demonstrated good to excellent inter-rater reliability across most items. The majority of items showed good to almost perfect agreement between raters. Notable variations emerged between professional groups, with inter-rater reliability being influenced by the number of response categories used for risk assessment. The German adaptation represents a reliable tool for pre-death bereavement risk assessment in German-speaking healthcare settings. Profession-specific training programs may enhance consistency across occupational groups. Further validation studies examining predictive validity for PGD outcomes are warranted.

BMC Palliative Care
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE), German Center for Lung Research (DE), Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (DE), Individual Differences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.