How Do the Non-Visitors Evaluate the Van Destination?

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:1.0cm"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Palatino Linotype&quot;,serif">This studyinvestigates the reasons why non-visitors do not travel to Van, examines theirtourist behaviour tendencies, and evaluates their perceptions of thedestination. Data were collected from 426 individuals using conveniencesampling via online and face-to-face surveys and analysed using SPSS 22.0.Descriptive statistics and </span><span lang="EN-US">parametric tests were used for the analyses.</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Palatino Linotype&quot;,serif"> Thefindings reveal that when Van is mentioned, the first elements that come tomind for non-visitors are Lake Van, the Van breakfast, and the Van cat.However, participants reported insufficient information about the destination,perceived transportation to Van as inadequate, and did not find the cityattractive. Moreover, Van was not considered a destination that would bringsocial prestige, and safety concerns, along with negative information fromtheir social environment, contributed to a generally unfavourable destination view.As a result, participants expressed hesitation and anxiety about visiting Vanin the future. Significant gender differences were also observed in touristbehaviour tendencies, with women exhibiting more positive holiday-relatedtendencies than men. In addition, individuals with postgraduate education heldmore favourable perceptions of Van than those with associate’s or bachelor’sdegrees. Based on these findings, the study offers recommendations fordestination managers, tourism practitioners, and future researchers to improveVan’s destination image and attractiveness.<o:p></o:p></span> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:1.0cm"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Palatino Linotype&quot;,serif">Key Words</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Palatino Linotype&quot;,serif">: Van,Non-visitors, Tourism behaviour tendencies, Destination perception.<o:p></o:p></span>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Academic Data Management System
Published
2026-04-01
Primary Topic
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do the Non-Visitors Evaluate the Van Destination?

Duygu METİN
Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Academic Data Management System
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
article

How Do the Non-Visitors Evaluate the Van Destination?

Duygu METİN
article en

Abstract

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:1.0cm"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Palatino Linotype&quot;,serif">This studyinvestigates the reasons why non-visitors do not travel to Van, examines theirtourist behaviour tendencies, and evaluates their perceptions of thedestination. Data were collected from 426 individuals using conveniencesampling via online and face-to-face surveys and analysed using SPSS 22.0.Descriptive statistics and </span><span lang="EN-US">parametric tests were used for the analyses.</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Palatino Linotype&quot;,serif"> Thefindings reveal that when Van is mentioned, the first elements that come tomind for non-visitors are Lake Van, the Van breakfast, and the Van cat.However, participants reported insufficient information about the destination,perceived transportation to Van as inadequate, and did not find the cityattractive. Moreover, Van was not considered a destination that would bringsocial prestige, and safety concerns, along with negative information fromtheir social environment, contributed to a generally unfavourable destination view.As a result, participants expressed hesitation and anxiety about visiting Vanin the future. Significant gender differences were also observed in touristbehaviour tendencies, with women exhibiting more positive holiday-relatedtendencies than men. In addition, individuals with postgraduate education heldmore favourable perceptions of Van than those with associate’s or bachelor’sdegrees. Based on these findings, the study offers recommendations fordestination managers, tourism practitioners, and future researchers to improveVan’s destination image and attractiveness.<o:p></o:p></span> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:6.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:6.0pt;margin-left:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:1.0cm"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Palatino Linotype&quot;,serif">Key Words</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Palatino Linotype&quot;,serif">: Van,Non-visitors, Tourism behaviour tendencies, Destination perception.<o:p></o:p></span>

Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Academic Data Management System
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.