‘Too naïve for politics’: Women and deliberative peacemaking

This chapter examines the exclusion of women from deliberative peacemaking despite UN Security Council Resolution 1325 by arguing that women’s mere presence without agenda-setting power constitutes an exclusion. Working with a model of feminist democratic deliberation—corporeal, contextual, affective, and emotionally literate—it contends that dominant norms of abstraction, neutrality, rationality, and balancing render women’s participation simply participatory. Using the island of Ireland, the chapter troubles claims of when conflict “ends” by foregrounding women’s experiences of gendered and structural violence and adopting a feminist theory of harm to reframe what counts as conflict, peace, and political violence. The chapter combines temporalities (the “living present” and allochronic time) and constituent power (creation, destruction, and legitimisation of legal/political orders), arguing for women’s rights to reject, to set agendas, and to occupy the public sphere. Mixing theoretical prefiguration with pragmatic, transversal praxis, the chapter proposes actionable iterations of feminist deliberative peacemaking to move feminist norms from the margins.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Published
2025-10-01
Primary Topic
Gender, Security, and Conflict
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Too naïve for politics’: Women and deliberative peacemaking

Aoife; id_orcid 0000-0002-2776-9333 O'Donoghue
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Gender, Security, and Conflict
article

‘Too naïve for politics’: Women and deliberative peacemaking

Aoife; id_orcid 0000-0002-2776-9333 O'Donoghue
article en

Abstract

This chapter examines the exclusion of women from deliberative peacemaking despite UN Security Council Resolution 1325 by arguing that women’s mere presence without agenda-setting power constitutes an exclusion. Working with a model of feminist democratic deliberation—corporeal, contextual, affective, and emotionally literate—it contends that dominant norms of abstraction, neutrality, rationality, and balancing render women’s participation simply participatory. Using the island of Ireland, the chapter troubles claims of when conflict “ends” by foregrounding women’s experiences of gendered and structural violence and adopting a feminist theory of harm to reframe what counts as conflict, peace, and political violence. The chapter combines temporalities (the “living present” and allochronic time) and constituent power (creation, destruction, and legitimisation of legal/political orders), arguing for women’s rights to reject, to set agendas, and to occupy the public sphere. Mixing theoretical prefiguration with pragmatic, transversal praxis, the chapter proposes actionable iterations of feminist deliberative peacemaking to move feminist norms from the margins.

Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Gender, Security, and Conflict
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.