CLASH-VLT: The variance in the velocity anisotropy profiles of galaxy clusters

Context. The velocity anisotropy profiles, β(r), of galaxy clusters are directly related to the shape of the orbits of their member galaxies. Knowledge of β(r) is important in order to understand the assembly process of clusters and the evolutionary processes of their galaxies, and to improve the determination of cluster masses based on cluster kinematics. Aims. We determined the β(r) of nine massive clusters at redshift 0.19 ≤ z ≤ 0.45 from the CLASH-VLT dataset, with ≃150–950 spectroscopic members each, to understand how much cluster-to-cluster variance exists in the β(r) of different clusters and what the main driver of this variance is. Methods. We selected spectroscopic cluster members with the <ns0:monospace>CLUMPS</ns0:monospace> algorithm calibrated on cosmological simulations. We applied the <ns0:monospace>MAMPOSSt</ns0:monospace> code to the distribution of cluster members in projected phase-space to constrain the cluster mass profile, M(r), using priors derived from a previous gravitational lensing analysis. Given the <ns0:monospace>MAMPOSSt</ns0:monospace> best-fit solution for M(r), we then solved the inversion of the Jeans equation to determine β(r) without assumptions of its functional form. We also ran the <ns0:monospace>DS+</ns0:monospace> code to identify subclusters and characterize the dynamical status of our clusters. Results. The average ⟨β(r)⟩ is slightly radial; the anisotropy increases from β ≃ 0.2 at the cluster center to β ≃ 0.5 at the virial radius. There is substantial variance in the β(r) of the individual clusters that cannot be entirely accounted for by the observational uncertainties. Clusters of lower mass and with a low concentration per given mass have more tangential β(r) profiles. A comparison with previous works in the literature suggests that orbits are more radial in clusters at higher z. A comparison with cluster-sized halos in cosmological hydrodynamical simulations indicates a very good agreement for the average ⟨β(r)⟩, but a smaller variance in the profiles than observed. Conclusions. Massive clusters cannot be characterized by a unique universal β(r). The orbital distribution of cluster galaxies carries information on the merging history of the cluster.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202555439/pdf
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CLASH-VLT: The variance in the velocity anisotropy profiles of galaxy clusters

Lorenzo Pizzuti, A. Biviano, Marianna Annunziatella, Cinthia Ragone-Figueroa et al.
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

CLASH-VLT: The variance in the velocity anisotropy profiles of galaxy clusters

Lorenzo Pizzuti, A. Biviano, Marianna Annunziatella, Cinthia Ragone-Figueroa, A. Mercurio, B. Sartoris, G. De Lucia, P. Rosati, G. L. Granato, C. Grillo, E. A. Maraboli, M. Girardi
article en

Abstract

Context. The velocity anisotropy profiles, β(r), of galaxy clusters are directly related to the shape of the orbits of their member galaxies. Knowledge of β(r) is important in order to understand the assembly process of clusters and the evolutionary processes of their galaxies, and to improve the determination of cluster masses based on cluster kinematics. Aims. We determined the β(r) of nine massive clusters at redshift 0.19 ≤ z ≤ 0.45 from the CLASH-VLT dataset, with ≃150–950 spectroscopic members each, to understand how much cluster-to-cluster variance exists in the β(r) of different clusters and what the main driver of this variance is. Methods. We selected spectroscopic cluster members with the <ns0:monospace>CLUMPS</ns0:monospace> algorithm calibrated on cosmological simulations. We applied the <ns0:monospace>MAMPOSSt</ns0:monospace> code to the distribution of cluster members in projected phase-space to constrain the cluster mass profile, M(r), using priors derived from a previous gravitational lensing analysis. Given the <ns0:monospace>MAMPOSSt</ns0:monospace> best-fit solution for M(r), we then solved the inversion of the Jeans equation to determine β(r) without assumptions of its functional form. We also ran the <ns0:monospace>DS+</ns0:monospace> code to identify subclusters and characterize the dynamical status of our clusters. Results. The average ⟨β(r)⟩ is slightly radial; the anisotropy increases from β ≃ 0.2 at the cluster center to β ≃ 0.5 at the virial radius. There is substantial variance in the β(r) of the individual clusters that cannot be entirely accounted for by the observational uncertainties. Clusters of lower mass and with a low concentration per given mass have more tangential β(r) profiles. A comparison with previous works in the literature suggests that orbits are more radial in clusters at higher z. A comparison with cluster-sized halos in cosmological hydrodynamical simulations indicates a very good agreement for the average ⟨β(r)⟩, but a smaller variance in the profiles than observed. Conclusions. Massive clusters cannot be characterized by a unique universal β(r). The orbital distribution of cluster galaxies carries information on the merging history of the cluster.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.