Rewilding people managing land:Society-nature interaction in biodiversity conservation on agricultural land

Temperate woodland conservation in southeastern Australia typically involves forms of exclusion, such as of fire, livestock grazing, forestry, and other productive land uses. However, these systems change approaches may underestimate path dependencies established by millennia of human co-evolution with myriad unique landscapes. Critique has emerged from the social sciences implicating the alienation of people from place in persistent declines in social-ecological wellbeing. Moreover, agricultural landholders understandably resist forms of exclusion that limit the productive capacity of their land, often understood as productivity losses due to opportunity costs. How might temperate woodland conservation adapt to these challenges? I applied a social-ecological systems framework and a knowledge coproduction methodology to implement a scoping study of woodland conservation on agricultural land between the Murrumbidgee and Murray River in southeast Australia. I deductively coded qualitative data generated from key informant interviews, field observation, document review, and deliberation with research partners. I analysed these data using reflexive thematic analysis and qualitative systems mapping methods to make sense of and visualise a pluralistic landscape of problem framings, actors, and goals. I then mapped and elaborated research narratives and facilitated focus groups to review, reflect upon, and renew an emergent research design. This approach generated key stakeholder support for research programs that investigate the introduction of large herbivores and predators to enhance biodiversity conservation outcomes. However, these findings may problematise approaches that limit land management to biodiversity conservation, with important implications for rewilding approaches. This scoping study indicates that rewilding can contribute to the recovery of species and ecologies, however the nature of that contribution must appropriately account for the society-nature interactions of local action situations and the co-evolutionary dynamics of the biosphere.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO)
Published
2025-06-20
Primary Topic
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rewilding people managing land:Society-nature interaction in biodiversity conservation on agricultural land

Mitchell; id_orcid 0009-0003-5400-7689 Lenehan
Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO)
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
article

Rewilding people managing land:Society-nature interaction in biodiversity conservation on agricultural land

Mitchell; id_orcid 0009-0003-5400-7689 Lenehan
article en

Abstract

Temperate woodland conservation in southeastern Australia typically involves forms of exclusion, such as of fire, livestock grazing, forestry, and other productive land uses. However, these systems change approaches may underestimate path dependencies established by millennia of human co-evolution with myriad unique landscapes. Critique has emerged from the social sciences implicating the alienation of people from place in persistent declines in social-ecological wellbeing. Moreover, agricultural landholders understandably resist forms of exclusion that limit the productive capacity of their land, often understood as productivity losses due to opportunity costs. How might temperate woodland conservation adapt to these challenges? I applied a social-ecological systems framework and a knowledge coproduction methodology to implement a scoping study of woodland conservation on agricultural land between the Murrumbidgee and Murray River in southeast Australia. I deductively coded qualitative data generated from key informant interviews, field observation, document review, and deliberation with research partners. I analysed these data using reflexive thematic analysis and qualitative systems mapping methods to make sense of and visualise a pluralistic landscape of problem framings, actors, and goals. I then mapped and elaborated research narratives and facilitated focus groups to review, reflect upon, and renew an emergent research design. This approach generated key stakeholder support for research programs that investigate the introduction of large herbivores and predators to enhance biodiversity conservation outcomes. However, these findings may problematise approaches that limit land management to biodiversity conservation, with important implications for rewilding approaches. This scoping study indicates that rewilding can contribute to the recovery of species and ecologies, however the nature of that contribution must appropriately account for the society-nature interactions of local action situations and the co-evolutionary dynamics of the biosphere.

Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO)
Cobalt Institute (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.