Advances in the measurement and interpretation of intervertebral motion in the lumbar spine

Background: Intervertebral motion is a fundamental aspect of spinal biomechanics, crucial for understanding lumbar spine function, pain mechanisms and surgical out-comes. Various methods exist for measuring and interpreting it, each with its own ad-vantages, limitations and specific applications. However, a comprehensive and standard taxonomy of study types for the measurement and interpretation of in vivo interverte-bral motion in the lumbar spine is lacking. Objectives: This review aimed to systemati-cally identify, characterize and categorize the diverse study types deposited in the lit-erature. Eligibility criteria: Only studies in English and of lumbar spine intervertebral motion in living subjects were considered and only those that employed objective measurement of motion sequences were included. Sources of evidence: A comprehen-sive literature search was performed in PubMed, CINAHL and SCOPUS for articles published between January 2000 and October 2025. Charting methods: After removal of duplicates, all studies were subjected to Title and abstract screening, followed by Full-text screening of potentially eligible studies. Data selected were charted into tables under the headings: Author, year, country, purpose, technology, participants, meas-urement, interpretation, radiation dosage and significance of findings. Results: For-ty-nine studies were abstracted and are described under 11 study types. These formed a taxonomy constituting the following 6 categories: Normal biomechanical mechanisms, Pathological and injury mechanisms, Direct kinematic measurement, Spinal stabiliza-tion, Dynamic radiography and Clinical markers. The resulting taxonomy will serve as a resource for researchers, clinicians and policymakers by facilitating a more coherent understanding of the field and promoting standardization in research design and re-porting.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University)
Published
2026-02-17
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advances in the measurement and interpretation of intervertebral motion in the lumbar spine

Alan Breen, M. Nematimoez, A. Breen, Alister John du Rose et al.
Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University)
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Advances in the measurement and interpretation of intervertebral motion in the lumbar spine

Alan Breen, M. Nematimoez, A. Breen, Alister John du Rose, Jonathan Branney
article en

Abstract

Background: Intervertebral motion is a fundamental aspect of spinal biomechanics, crucial for understanding lumbar spine function, pain mechanisms and surgical out-comes. Various methods exist for measuring and interpreting it, each with its own ad-vantages, limitations and specific applications. However, a comprehensive and standard taxonomy of study types for the measurement and interpretation of in vivo interverte-bral motion in the lumbar spine is lacking. Objectives: This review aimed to systemati-cally identify, characterize and categorize the diverse study types deposited in the lit-erature. Eligibility criteria: Only studies in English and of lumbar spine intervertebral motion in living subjects were considered and only those that employed objective measurement of motion sequences were included. Sources of evidence: A comprehen-sive literature search was performed in PubMed, CINAHL and SCOPUS for articles published between January 2000 and October 2025. Charting methods: After removal of duplicates, all studies were subjected to Title and abstract screening, followed by Full-text screening of potentially eligible studies. Data selected were charted into tables under the headings: Author, year, country, purpose, technology, participants, meas-urement, interpretation, radiation dosage and significance of findings. Results: For-ty-nine studies were abstracted and are described under 11 study types. These formed a taxonomy constituting the following 6 categories: Normal biomechanical mechanisms, Pathological and injury mechanisms, Direct kinematic measurement, Spinal stabiliza-tion, Dynamic radiography and Clinical markers. The resulting taxonomy will serve as a resource for researchers, clinicians and policymakers by facilitating a more coherent understanding of the field and promoting standardization in research design and re-porting.

Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.