Networked Migrants and De‐Networked Policies—Examining the Nexus of Migration Regimes and Experiences Through a Relational Lens

ABSTRACT Drawing on theory and practice of social network research, this article examines the nexus between networked migration experiences and de‐networked migration policies in countries of arrival. Building upon classical network scholarship and our own contributions to qualitative network research, we show how migration policies in Europe tend to ignore or actively oppose the relational, meso‐level of migrants’ experience. This includes, for example, kinship networks, involving narrow definitions of family and ‘worthiness’. Such approaches, increasingly enforced by governments across the whole policy spectrum, hinder migrants’ social trajectories but also push them to find (networked) ways to resist and circumvent policy regimes, as demonstrated through our case studies of Sub‐Saharan forced migrants in Italy and Afghans in London. By taking a network lens—and working at the intersection of Relational Sociology and Policy Analysis—our argument goes beyond the agency‐versus‐structure binary, exploring the mediating meso‐level of relationality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Networks
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.70046
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Networked Migrants and De‐Networked Policies—Examining the Nexus of Migration Regimes and Experiences Through a Relational Lens

Alessio D’Angelo, Louise Ryan
Global Networks
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Networked Migrants and De‐Networked Policies—Examining the Nexus of Migration Regimes and Experiences Through a Relational Lens

Alessio D’Angelo, Louise Ryan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Drawing on theory and practice of social network research, this article examines the nexus between networked migration experiences and de‐networked migration policies in countries of arrival. Building upon classical network scholarship and our own contributions to qualitative network research, we show how migration policies in Europe tend to ignore or actively oppose the relational, meso‐level of migrants’ experience. This includes, for example, kinship networks, involving narrow definitions of family and ‘worthiness’. Such approaches, increasingly enforced by governments across the whole policy spectrum, hinder migrants’ social trajectories but also push them to find (networked) ways to resist and circumvent policy regimes, as demonstrated through our case studies of Sub‐Saharan forced migrants in Italy and Afghans in London. By taking a network lens—and working at the intersection of Relational Sociology and Policy Analysis—our argument goes beyond the agency‐versus‐structure binary, exploring the mediating meso‐level of relationality.

Global NetworksVol. 26(2)
London Metropolitan University (GB), University of Derby (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.