Preoperative Predictors of Right Ventricular Assist Device Requirement After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Background: Right ventricular failure (RVF) remains a major determinant of morbidity and mortality following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. In its most severe form, RVF necessitates right ventricular assist device (RVAD) support, which is associated with markedly worse early and long-term outcomes. While numerous studies have examined predictors of post-LVAD RVF, few have focused specifically on RVAD implantation as a discrete and clinically decisive endpoint. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify robust preoperative predictors of RVAD requirement following LVAD implantation. Methods: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and PubMed was conducted from inception to August 2025 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies enrolling adult patients undergoing durable or temporary LVAD implantation and reporting preoperative predictors of postoperative RVAD requirement were included. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, with predefined sensitivity and subgroup analyses based on LVAD era and study size. Results: Twenty studies met inclusion criteria, of which nineteen comprising 31,591 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Several consistent preoperative predictors of RVAD requirement were identified across clinical, haemodynamic, echocardiographic, and laboratory domains. Patients requiring RVAD were younger (MD –3.57 years) and more frequently female, had a higher likelihood of prior cardiac surgery, INTERMACS Profile 1 status, and need for preoperative mechanical support including ventilation and intra-aortic balloon pump. Haemodynamic predictors included elevated central venous pressure, higher CVP/PCWP ratio, lower cardiac index, and reduced right ventricular stroke work index. Echocardiographic predictors included severe tricuspid regurgitation and lower tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. Laboratory markers of hepatic dysfunction, coagulopathy, malnutrition, anaemia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated natriuretic peptides were also significantly associated with RVAD implantation. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent direction of effects across LVAD eras and study sizes. Conclusion: RVAD requirement after LVAD implantation is driven by a constellation of high clinical acuity, haemodynamic compromise, and end-organ dysfunction rather than any single isolated variable. A comprehensive, multi-parameter preoperative assessment is essential to identify patients at highest risk and to guide patient selection, preoperative optimisation, and consideration of planned biventricular support strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Heart Surgery Forum
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/hsf50915
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preoperative Predictors of Right Ventricular Assist Device Requirement After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Mohamed Osman, Espeed Khoshbin, Maria Comanici, A. Page et al.
The Heart Surgery Forum
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Preoperative Predictors of Right Ventricular Assist Device Requirement After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Mohamed Osman, Espeed Khoshbin, Maria Comanici, A. Page, Anonna Das, Charlene Camangon, Hatem Soliman-Aboumarie, Iffat Zahan, Shahzad G. Raja, Anton Sabashnikov, Maria Montegudo-Vela, Nandor Marczin
article en

Abstract

Background: Right ventricular failure (RVF) remains a major determinant of morbidity and mortality following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. In its most severe form, RVF necessitates right ventricular assist device (RVAD) support, which is associated with markedly worse early and long-term outcomes. While numerous studies have examined predictors of post-LVAD RVF, few have focused specifically on RVAD implantation as a discrete and clinically decisive endpoint. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify robust preoperative predictors of RVAD requirement following LVAD implantation. Methods: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and PubMed was conducted from inception to August 2025 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies enrolling adult patients undergoing durable or temporary LVAD implantation and reporting preoperative predictors of postoperative RVAD requirement were included. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, with predefined sensitivity and subgroup analyses based on LVAD era and study size. Results: Twenty studies met inclusion criteria, of which nineteen comprising 31,591 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Several consistent preoperative predictors of RVAD requirement were identified across clinical, haemodynamic, echocardiographic, and laboratory domains. Patients requiring RVAD were younger (MD –3.57 years) and more frequently female, had a higher likelihood of prior cardiac surgery, INTERMACS Profile 1 status, and need for preoperative mechanical support including ventilation and intra-aortic balloon pump. Haemodynamic predictors included elevated central venous pressure, higher CVP/PCWP ratio, lower cardiac index, and reduced right ventricular stroke work index. Echocardiographic predictors included severe tricuspid regurgitation and lower tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. Laboratory markers of hepatic dysfunction, coagulopathy, malnutrition, anaemia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated natriuretic peptides were also significantly associated with RVAD implantation. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent direction of effects across LVAD eras and study sizes. Conclusion: RVAD requirement after LVAD implantation is driven by a constellation of high clinical acuity, haemodynamic compromise, and end-organ dysfunction rather than any single isolated variable. A comprehensive, multi-parameter preoperative assessment is essential to identify patients at highest risk and to guide patient selection, preoperative optimisation, and consideration of planned biventricular support strategies.

The Heart Surgery ForumVol. 29(2)
Semmelweis University (HU), Harefield Hospital (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.