New York Longitudinal Study Temperament Types Revisited: A Latent Profile Analysis of Individual Differences in Adults

Background: The New York Longitudinal Study (NYLS) identified three core temperament types—Easy, Difficult, and Slow-to-warm-up—based on early qualitative analyses of childhood behavior and constrained by the analytic tools available at the time. However, more than one-third of participants could not be classified within this framework, and the typology has never been formally revised using contemporary statistical approaches, which limits the model’s generalizability. Despite these methodological constraints, the nine NYLS temperament dimensions and their associated typology have remained influential in both research and applied contexts. Methods: This study revisited the NYLS framework using latent profile analysis (LPA), a probabilistic person-centered method that identifies latent subgroups based on multivariate response patterns. Data were drawn from a large adult sample assessed with the standardized Chess–Thomas Adult Temperament Questionnaire, second edition (ATQ2), as well as its newly validated Lithuanian version. The sample comprised 1260 adults aged 18–80 years (M = 32.2) from the USA (n = 554) and Lithuania (n = 706). To enhance robustness and cross-group comparability, measurement invariance (MI) was tested across country, gender, and age groups. Results: A five-profile solution emerged as optimal. Three profiles resembled the classic NYLS types—Easy (13.1%), Difficult (11.1%), and Slow-to-warm-up (13.5%)—and two additional profiles were identified: Curious (33.3%) and Shy (29.0%). The new profiles reflected coherent behavioral patterns centered on approach-withdrawal tendencies and activity level, demonstrated conceptual convergence with other temperament and personality typologies, and remained consistent across demographic groups. Conclusions: These findings refine and expand the original NYLS typology with greater methodological rigor, providing a statistically validated framework for understanding adult temperament that can inform future developmental research, psychological assessment, and clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual
Published
2026-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/bp45740
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New York Longitudinal Study Temperament Types Revisited: A Latent Profile Analysis of Individual Differences in Adults

Tomas Lazdauskas, Sean C. McDevitt
Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
article

New York Longitudinal Study Temperament Types Revisited: A Latent Profile Analysis of Individual Differences in Adults

Tomas Lazdauskas, Sean C. McDevitt
article en

Abstract

Background: The New York Longitudinal Study (NYLS) identified three core temperament types—Easy, Difficult, and Slow-to-warm-up—based on early qualitative analyses of childhood behavior and constrained by the analytic tools available at the time. However, more than one-third of participants could not be classified within this framework, and the typology has never been formally revised using contemporary statistical approaches, which limits the model’s generalizability. Despite these methodological constraints, the nine NYLS temperament dimensions and their associated typology have remained influential in both research and applied contexts. Methods: This study revisited the NYLS framework using latent profile analysis (LPA), a probabilistic person-centered method that identifies latent subgroups based on multivariate response patterns. Data were drawn from a large adult sample assessed with the standardized Chess–Thomas Adult Temperament Questionnaire, second edition (ATQ2), as well as its newly validated Lithuanian version. The sample comprised 1260 adults aged 18–80 years (M = 32.2) from the USA (n = 554) and Lithuania (n = 706). To enhance robustness and cross-group comparability, measurement invariance (MI) was tested across country, gender, and age groups. Results: A five-profile solution emerged as optimal. Three profiles resembled the classic NYLS types—Easy (13.1%), Difficult (11.1%), and Slow-to-warm-up (13.5%)—and two additional profiles were identified: Curious (33.3%) and Shy (29.0%). The new profiles reflected coherent behavioral patterns centered on approach-withdrawal tendencies and activity level, demonstrated conceptual convergence with other temperament and personality typologies, and remained consistent across demographic groups. Conclusions: These findings refine and expand the original NYLS typology with greater methodological rigor, providing a statistically validated framework for understanding adult temperament that can inform future developmental research, psychological assessment, and clinical practice.

Behavioral Psychology/Psicología ConductualVol. 34(1)
Vilnius University (LT), Development Initiatives (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.