Educational professionals' perspectives on Low Saxon in primary education

In the Netherlands, the Primary Education Act permits teaching regional minority languages (RML) where they are spoken (Herweijer & Jans, 2009). In the north and east, variants of Dutch Low Saxon are spoken (Bloemhoff & van der Kooi, 2008), yet it is not a standard part of the primary education curriculum. As a key cultural and linguistic heritage element, its inclusion is valuable (Duarte et al., 2021). This research explores the feasibility of integrating Low Saxon into the primary education curriculum and the preferences of teachers, principals, supervisors, and language coordinators regarding its inclusion (Duarte & Günther-van der Meij, 2022). The needs analysis, part of a longitudinal study on developing a Low Saxon curriculum, was commissioned by various language and heritage organizations and conducted by NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences. It involved a questionnaire sent to 1,594 primary schools, addressing the following research questions: What challenges do primary school staff perceive in including the regional language in their curriculum? What attitudes do primary school staff have towards the inclusion of the regional language in education? Should pupils from all linguistic backgrounds be included in regional language education, according to primary education staff? The questionnaire, adapted from an existing one by NHL Stenden on neighbor language education, yielded preliminary results (N=100) showing significant variation in attitudes towards incorporating Low Saxon in education. Main obstacles identified by staff include a lack of knowledge about the language, insufficient curriculum time, and a shortage of ready-to-use materials. Additionally, primary teachers do not see the necessity for children who speak migrant languages to learn Low Saxon. Negative attitudes towards Low Saxon education and a lack of knowledge about multilingualism further hinder its integration. Therefore, support from provincial and national governments is needed to address these issues and promote school-level policies for regional language education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18818260
Primary Topic
Employee Welfare and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Educational professionals' perspectives on Low Saxon in primary education

Cato Piek, Jordi Jager, Mirjam Günther-van der Meij, Bart van Donselaar
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Employee Welfare and Language Studies
article

Educational professionals' perspectives on Low Saxon in primary education

Cato Piek, Jordi Jager, Mirjam Günther-van der Meij, Bart van Donselaar
article en

Abstract

In the Netherlands, the Primary Education Act permits teaching regional minority languages (RML) where they are spoken (Herweijer & Jans, 2009). In the north and east, variants of Dutch Low Saxon are spoken (Bloemhoff & van der Kooi, 2008), yet it is not a standard part of the primary education curriculum. As a key cultural and linguistic heritage element, its inclusion is valuable (Duarte et al., 2021). This research explores the feasibility of integrating Low Saxon into the primary education curriculum and the preferences of teachers, principals, supervisors, and language coordinators regarding its inclusion (Duarte & Günther-van der Meij, 2022). The needs analysis, part of a longitudinal study on developing a Low Saxon curriculum, was commissioned by various language and heritage organizations and conducted by NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences. It involved a questionnaire sent to 1,594 primary schools, addressing the following research questions: What challenges do primary school staff perceive in including the regional language in their curriculum? What attitudes do primary school staff have towards the inclusion of the regional language in education? Should pupils from all linguistic backgrounds be included in regional language education, according to primary education staff? The questionnaire, adapted from an existing one by NHL Stenden on neighbor language education, yielded preliminary results (N=100) showing significant variation in attitudes towards incorporating Low Saxon in education. Main obstacles identified by staff include a lack of knowledge about the language, insufficient curriculum time, and a shortage of ready-to-use materials. Additionally, primary teachers do not see the necessity for children who speak migrant languages to learn Low Saxon. Negative attitudes towards Low Saxon education and a lack of knowledge about multilingualism further hinder its integration. Therefore, support from provincial and national governments is needed to address these issues and promote school-level policies for regional language education.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Groningen (NL), Stenden University of Applied Sciences (NL), Stenden University Qatar (QA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Employee Welfare and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.