Hatchability and nestling viability in an extremely short-beaked pigeon breed

The selection of hobby animals for breeding by enthusiasts is often based on aesthetic considerations, which can have a negative impact on the animals’ biology. Furthermore, “extreme traits” that deviate from ancestral norms, such as short beaks in pigeons, can be detrimental to the animal’s welfare. Beaks perform many essential functions, such as facilitating feed intake and eggshell breaking. The present study investigates possible hatching problems and the nestling viability of short-beak pigeons through a study of the breeding records of Mısıri (short beak), Baska (medium beak), and Turkish Dönek (normal beak) pigeons, as well as data from one breeding season of Mısıri pigeons (e.g. records of unfertilized eggs, embryo losses, deaths in shell, and nestling losses before and after ringing). The hatching rates and nestling viabilities of Baska, Turkish Dönek, and Mısıri breeds were 74.34%, 84.62%, and 60.05%, and 76.99%, 89.39%, and 77.82%, respectively, and the effect of breed on both traits was significant (p = 0.0238). The hatching probability of Mısıri eggs was lower than that of Baska or Dönek eggs. The probability of Turkish Dönek nestlings reaching fledgling age was 2.94 times greater than that of Mısıri nestlings (p = 0.0226). During the incubation period of Mısıri eggs, the lowest was embryo loss (2.78%) and the highest was “dead in shell” (20.00%). In Mısıri nestlings, nestling mortality was highest in the ≤10-day period (26.79%). It can be concluded that the hatching outcomes and nestling viability of Mısıri pigeons are suboptimal when compared to normal beaked Turkish Dönek pigeons.

Publication Details

Journal
TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY AND ANIMAL SCIENCES
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0128.4406
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hatchability and nestling viability in an extremely short-beaked pigeon breed

TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY AND ANIMAL SCIENCES
Avian ecology and behavior
article

Hatchability and nestling viability in an extremely short-beaked pigeon breed

article en

Abstract

The selection of hobby animals for breeding by enthusiasts is often based on aesthetic considerations, which can have a negative impact on the animals’ biology. Furthermore, “extreme traits” that deviate from ancestral norms, such as short beaks in pigeons, can be detrimental to the animal’s welfare. Beaks perform many essential functions, such as facilitating feed intake and eggshell breaking. The present study investigates possible hatching problems and the nestling viability of short-beak pigeons through a study of the breeding records of Mısıri (short beak), Baska (medium beak), and Turkish Dönek (normal beak) pigeons, as well as data from one breeding season of Mısıri pigeons (e.g. records of unfertilized eggs, embryo losses, deaths in shell, and nestling losses before and after ringing). The hatching rates and nestling viabilities of Baska, Turkish Dönek, and Mısıri breeds were 74.34%, 84.62%, and 60.05%, and 76.99%, 89.39%, and 77.82%, respectively, and the effect of breed on both traits was significant (p = 0.0238). The hatching probability of Mısıri eggs was lower than that of Baska or Dönek eggs. The probability of Turkish Dönek nestlings reaching fledgling age was 2.94 times greater than that of Mısıri nestlings (p = 0.0226). During the incubation period of Mısıri eggs, the lowest was embryo loss (2.78%) and the highest was “dead in shell” (20.00%). In Mısıri nestlings, nestling mortality was highest in the ≤10-day period (26.79%). It can be concluded that the hatching outcomes and nestling viability of Mısıri pigeons are suboptimal when compared to normal beaked Turkish Dönek pigeons.

TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY AND ANIMAL SCIENCESVol. 50(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Avian ecology and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.