Measuring equity in the agricultural water sector: a dynamic negotiated concept

ABSTRACT Although the terms efficiency, equity, and environmental sustainability are often mentioned in the same breath in agricultural water management, less attention has been paid to equity than to efficiency and environmental sustainability. This occurs because equity involves making decisions about people and trade-offs in distribution and outcomes of which decision-makers have little quantitative knowledge. This paper aims to clarify the conceptual issues that arise in assessing and quantifying equity issues in the water sector. The implications of ignoring equity in favour of efficiency in the water sector are great. Understanding the equitable status of a distribution relies on four basic principles involving how the distribution of the resources is defined, determining what constitutes a fair distribution, how the resources are valued, and how redistribution problems are handled. Equity is a negotiated concept where shares of a resource or good are, in some cases, determined through a political process of debate, one that could be argued results in less equitable outcomes than desired.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Policy
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2026.330
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring equity in the agricultural water sector: a dynamic negotiated concept

Brian Davidson, Petra Hellegers
Water Policy
Water resources management and optimization
article

Measuring equity in the agricultural water sector: a dynamic negotiated concept

Brian Davidson, Petra Hellegers
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although the terms efficiency, equity, and environmental sustainability are often mentioned in the same breath in agricultural water management, less attention has been paid to equity than to efficiency and environmental sustainability. This occurs because equity involves making decisions about people and trade-offs in distribution and outcomes of which decision-makers have little quantitative knowledge. This paper aims to clarify the conceptual issues that arise in assessing and quantifying equity issues in the water sector. The implications of ignoring equity in favour of efficiency in the water sector are great. Understanding the equitable status of a distribution relies on four basic principles involving how the distribution of the resources is defined, determining what constitutes a fair distribution, how the resources are valued, and how redistribution problems are handled. Equity is a negotiated concept where shares of a resource or good are, in some cases, determined through a political process of debate, one that could be argued results in less equitable outcomes than desired.

Water PolicyVol. 28(2)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Water resources management and optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.