Lidocaine for Chronic Pain: Effectiveness, Safety, and Symptom Relief [Conference Winner Abstract]

Introduction Chronic pain impairs quality of life and productivity. Intravenous (i.v.) lidocaine, a commonly used anesthetic, has shown promise for chronic pain management. Recent studies highlight that i.v. lidocaine provides significant pain relief and improves chronic pain-related symptoms, particularly in neuropathic pain conditions [1]. Additionally, it has been shown to stabilize hemodynamic parameters, ensuring its safety during administration [2]. Further research is needed to comprehensively understand its impact on pain relief, hemodynamics, and symptom management. Aim To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of i.v. lidocaine in managing pain, addressing associated symptoms, and assessing its impact on hemodynamic parameters. Methods In total, 75 patients were analyzed retrospectively (44% male; mean age 49.6 years), receiving i.v. lidocaine (1 mg/kg) for chronic pain. Data on pain scores, symptom improvement, hemodynamic parameters, and the role of work type in the onset of pain were obtained from an anonymous questionnaire previously administered to patients during one of their 1st to 6th treatment sessions. Results Pain scores dropped significantly from 8.89 to 6.65, representing a 25.2% reduction (p < 0.001). The most common pain quality reported was stinging (53%, n = 40), followed by burning (21%, n = 16) and locking (12%, n = 9). Notably, lidocaine demonstrated better outcomes for upper-back and neck pain (40.5%, p < 0.01) compared to lower-back pain (19.2%, p < 0.01). Before treatment, 80% of patients (n = 60) reported problems with sleep, 68% (n = 51) experienced reduced activity, and 64% (n = 48) noted emotional suffering. Following treatment, significant improvements were observed, particularly in sleep quality (45%, n = 34, p < 0.01), emotional well-being (24%, n = 18, p < 0.01), and physical activity (15%, n = 11, p < 0.01). Among these, sleep quality showed the most pronounced improvement. In terms of hemodynamic effects, systolic blood pressure decreased by 8.4 mmHg (p = 0.053), diastolic blood pressure by 5.1 mmHg (p = 0.078), and heart rate by 3.6 bpm (p = 0.084). These changes remained within safe clinical limits. Side effects were minimal, with only 2.67% (n = 2) of patients experiencing mild dizziness, and no other adverse effects reported. Conclusions Intravenous lidocaine (1 mg/kg) significantly reduces pain and improves symptoms, with minimal side effects. It is particularly effective for upper back and neck pain, distinguishing it as a targeted option for chronic pain in these areas. The observed hemodynamic stability further supports its use as a safe therapy. Future research in larger, randomized studies is warranted to validate these findings and explore lidocaine’s therapeutic potential.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Published
2025-03-13
Primary Topic
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lidocaine for Chronic Pain: Effectiveness, Safety, and Symptom Relief [Conference Winner Abstract]

Liuda Brogienė, Andrius Macas, Arnas Pačiuipis
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
article

Lidocaine for Chronic Pain: Effectiveness, Safety, and Symptom Relief [Conference Winner Abstract]

Liuda Brogienė, Andrius Macas, Arnas Pačiuipis
article en

Abstract

Introduction Chronic pain impairs quality of life and productivity. Intravenous (i.v.) lidocaine, a commonly used anesthetic, has shown promise for chronic pain management. Recent studies highlight that i.v. lidocaine provides significant pain relief and improves chronic pain-related symptoms, particularly in neuropathic pain conditions [1]. Additionally, it has been shown to stabilize hemodynamic parameters, ensuring its safety during administration [2]. Further research is needed to comprehensively understand its impact on pain relief, hemodynamics, and symptom management. Aim To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of i.v. lidocaine in managing pain, addressing associated symptoms, and assessing its impact on hemodynamic parameters. Methods In total, 75 patients were analyzed retrospectively (44% male; mean age 49.6 years), receiving i.v. lidocaine (1 mg/kg) for chronic pain. Data on pain scores, symptom improvement, hemodynamic parameters, and the role of work type in the onset of pain were obtained from an anonymous questionnaire previously administered to patients during one of their 1st to 6th treatment sessions. Results Pain scores dropped significantly from 8.89 to 6.65, representing a 25.2% reduction (p < 0.001). The most common pain quality reported was stinging (53%, n = 40), followed by burning (21%, n = 16) and locking (12%, n = 9). Notably, lidocaine demonstrated better outcomes for upper-back and neck pain (40.5%, p < 0.01) compared to lower-back pain (19.2%, p < 0.01). Before treatment, 80% of patients (n = 60) reported problems with sleep, 68% (n = 51) experienced reduced activity, and 64% (n = 48) noted emotional suffering. Following treatment, significant improvements were observed, particularly in sleep quality (45%, n = 34, p < 0.01), emotional well-being (24%, n = 18, p < 0.01), and physical activity (15%, n = 11, p < 0.01). Among these, sleep quality showed the most pronounced improvement. In terms of hemodynamic effects, systolic blood pressure decreased by 8.4 mmHg (p = 0.053), diastolic blood pressure by 5.1 mmHg (p = 0.078), and heart rate by 3.6 bpm (p = 0.084). These changes remained within safe clinical limits. Side effects were minimal, with only 2.67% (n = 2) of patients experiencing mild dizziness, and no other adverse effects reported. Conclusions Intravenous lidocaine (1 mg/kg) significantly reduces pain and improves symptoms, with minimal side effects. It is particularly effective for upper back and neck pain, distinguishing it as a targeted option for chronic pain in these areas. The observed hemodynamic stability further supports its use as a safe therapy. Future research in larger, randomized studies is warranted to validate these findings and explore lidocaine’s therapeutic potential.

Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.