Labour movements in hybrid regimes: Pursuing the trade union struggle in Turkey over last two decades

<p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.295;text-indent: 36pt;text-align: justify;margin-top:12pt;margin-bottom:12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;, serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Labour unions, typically associated with pluralist democratic systems, not only serve as democratising forces within workplaces but also significantly increase voter turnout and promote broader civic participation (Fiorito &amp; Padavic, 2020). Moreover, they act as conduits for information and representation in the political process, thereby reinforcing the democratic fabric of society (Sojourner, 2013). However, in many authoritarian contexts, such as China and South Korea, labour unions are often co-opted by the state, functioning as instruments to suppress dissent and maintain control over the labour force (Kwon &amp; O’Donnell, 1999; Howell, 2008; Han Heng, 2010). This contrast illustrates that while labour unions can play a critical role in enhancing democracy and civic engagement in pluralist regimes, their function can be distorted in authoritarian contexts where they become tools of state power. But where do unions stand when it comes to the hybrid regimes that are characterising the regimes of more and more countries today? Do they serve democratisation in these countries, or do they align with the state and become a component of the repressive regime?&nbsp;</span> <span id="docs-internal-guid-90469cf0-7fff-6125-a82f-61d109074926"></span> <p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.295;text-indent: 36pt;text-align: justify;margin-top:12pt;margin-bottom:12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;, serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">In this paper, which aims to contribute to this issue, we will emphasise the importance of moving beyond the dichotomous perspective that separates pluralist democratic regimes from authoritarian ones. </span>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Galatasaray University - AVESIS
Published
2024-10-10
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Labour movements in hybrid regimes: Pursuing the trade union struggle in Turkey over last two decades

Cem Özatalay, Elif Can
Galatasaray University - AVESIS
Labor Movements and Unions
article

Labour movements in hybrid regimes: Pursuing the trade union struggle in Turkey over last two decades

Cem Özatalay, Elif Can
article en

Abstract

<p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.295;text-indent: 36pt;text-align: justify;margin-top:12pt;margin-bottom:12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;, serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">Labour unions, typically associated with pluralist democratic systems, not only serve as democratising forces within workplaces but also significantly increase voter turnout and promote broader civic participation (Fiorito &amp; Padavic, 2020). Moreover, they act as conduits for information and representation in the political process, thereby reinforcing the democratic fabric of society (Sojourner, 2013). However, in many authoritarian contexts, such as China and South Korea, labour unions are often co-opted by the state, functioning as instruments to suppress dissent and maintain control over the labour force (Kwon &amp; O’Donnell, 1999; Howell, 2008; Han Heng, 2010). This contrast illustrates that while labour unions can play a critical role in enhancing democracy and civic engagement in pluralist regimes, their function can be distorted in authoritarian contexts where they become tools of state power. But where do unions stand when it comes to the hybrid regimes that are characterising the regimes of more and more countries today? Do they serve democratisation in these countries, or do they align with the state and become a component of the repressive regime?&nbsp;</span> <span id="docs-internal-guid-90469cf0-7fff-6125-a82f-61d109074926"></span> <p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.295;text-indent: 36pt;text-align: justify;margin-top:12pt;margin-bottom:12pt;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;, serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;">In this paper, which aims to contribute to this issue, we will emphasise the importance of moving beyond the dichotomous perspective that separates pluralist democratic regimes from authoritarian ones. </span>

Galatasaray University - AVESIS
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Labour movements in hybrid regimes: Pursuing the trade union struggle in Turkey over last two decades — Cem Özatalay, Elif Can · Galatasaray University - AVESIS (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS