Sudden Cardiac Death: Was It Possible to Prevent It?

Introduction Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic heart condition that can lead to sudden cardiac death (SCD), especially in young adults [1]. In this case a 32 year old man with HCM ignored medical advice for further tests and later suffered SCD, raising the question of whether these missed evaluations could have changed the outcome. Case Presentation In 2023 patient visited a cardiologist, who recommended further investigations: cardiac MRI, Holter monitoring, and genetic consultation and prescribed beta-blocker. Unfortunately, the patient did not undergo the tests as he felt satisfied with his current state of health. One year later, he suffered a SCD and was successfully resuscitated after eight minutes. After hospital admission, diagnostic tests were made. Echocardiography showed left (LV) and right ventricle hypertrophy with mildly reduced ejection fraction. Cardiac MRI showed left ventricle fibrosis. Based on European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was implanted for secondary prevention of SCD. Discussion ESC guidelines recommend a comprehensive SCD risk assessment, including validated risk scores, for primary prevention in HCM patients. These evaluations consider age, syncope history, LV function and structure, scaring of myocardium [2]. Although the patient did not undergo the recommended diagnostic measures, post-event findings indicated he would have been classified as low-risk patient and would not have qualified for primary prophylactic ICD implantation. It is also unclear whether the patient would have suffered SCD if he had undergone diagnostic investigations and received additional pharmacological treatment, as there is limited literature on the effect of drugs on mortality as one evidence based article states that while medications alleviate symptoms, they do not improve long-term mortality [3]. Conclusions This case emphasis the difficulties of preventing SCD, as the ESC guidelines give a strong foundation for managing HCM patients, there is still uncertainty regarding primary prophylaxis. Additionally, there are very few studies on the effect of pharmacological treatment on the disease progression and mortality. Increased research in this field could provide valuable insights into improving SCD prevention strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Published
2025-03-13
Primary Topic
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sudden Cardiac Death: Was It Possible to Prevent It?

Jolanta Laukaitienė, Eglė Ereminienė, Giedrė Bakšytė, Karolis Teodoras Uus et al.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
article

Sudden Cardiac Death: Was It Possible to Prevent It?

Jolanta Laukaitienė, Eglė Ereminienė, Giedrė Bakšytė, Karolis Teodoras Uus, Matas Streckis
article en

Abstract

Introduction Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic heart condition that can lead to sudden cardiac death (SCD), especially in young adults [1]. In this case a 32 year old man with HCM ignored medical advice for further tests and later suffered SCD, raising the question of whether these missed evaluations could have changed the outcome. Case Presentation In 2023 patient visited a cardiologist, who recommended further investigations: cardiac MRI, Holter monitoring, and genetic consultation and prescribed beta-blocker. Unfortunately, the patient did not undergo the tests as he felt satisfied with his current state of health. One year later, he suffered a SCD and was successfully resuscitated after eight minutes. After hospital admission, diagnostic tests were made. Echocardiography showed left (LV) and right ventricle hypertrophy with mildly reduced ejection fraction. Cardiac MRI showed left ventricle fibrosis. Based on European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was implanted for secondary prevention of SCD. Discussion ESC guidelines recommend a comprehensive SCD risk assessment, including validated risk scores, for primary prevention in HCM patients. These evaluations consider age, syncope history, LV function and structure, scaring of myocardium [2]. Although the patient did not undergo the recommended diagnostic measures, post-event findings indicated he would have been classified as low-risk patient and would not have qualified for primary prophylactic ICD implantation. It is also unclear whether the patient would have suffered SCD if he had undergone diagnostic investigations and received additional pharmacological treatment, as there is limited literature on the effect of drugs on mortality as one evidence based article states that while medications alleviate symptoms, they do not improve long-term mortality [3]. Conclusions This case emphasis the difficulties of preventing SCD, as the ESC guidelines give a strong foundation for managing HCM patients, there is still uncertainty regarding primary prophylaxis. Additionally, there are very few studies on the effect of pharmacological treatment on the disease progression and mortality. Increased research in this field could provide valuable insights into improving SCD prevention strategies.

Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.