Physiological Sensor Data and Clinical Outcomes: Insights into Survival and Disease Progression in Oncology

This study aimed to evaluate physiological data from various patient sensors and their associations with clinical endpoints such as survival and disease progression. The study analyzed data from living and deceased patients and those who progressed and did not progress during the course of the disease. First, graphs were created for each sensor to visualize the differences in curves between the living and deceased groups of patients. Analogous analysis was performed for patients who experienced disease progression compared to those who did not experience progression [1]. Overall survival (OS), follow-up period, and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using mean, standard deviation (SD), median, and min-max intervals. In addition, survival among deceased patients and time to progression among progressive patients were analyzed. Quality of life questionnaire data were correlated with sensor measures using both parametric and nonparametric methods in the entire patient sample [2]. Finally, the formulas and assumptions used in the analysis of each sensor were fully documented to ensure the reliability and reproducibility of the results. The results of the study will provide a better understanding of the interrelationships between physiological indicators and clinical endpoints and potentially contribute to the development of personalized medicine strategies in oncology [3].

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Published
2025-08-27
Primary Topic
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physiological Sensor Data and Clinical Outcomes: Insights into Survival and Disease Progression in Oncology

Jonas Venius, Ričardas Krikštolaitis, Gabriele Darge, Gabrielė Kasputytė et al.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
article

Physiological Sensor Data and Clinical Outcomes: Insights into Survival and Disease Progression in Oncology

Jonas Venius, Ričardas Krikštolaitis, Gabriele Darge, Gabrielė Kasputytė, Adomas Bunevičius
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate physiological data from various patient sensors and their associations with clinical endpoints such as survival and disease progression. The study analyzed data from living and deceased patients and those who progressed and did not progress during the course of the disease. First, graphs were created for each sensor to visualize the differences in curves between the living and deceased groups of patients. Analogous analysis was performed for patients who experienced disease progression compared to those who did not experience progression [1]. Overall survival (OS), follow-up period, and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using mean, standard deviation (SD), median, and min-max intervals. In addition, survival among deceased patients and time to progression among progressive patients were analyzed. Quality of life questionnaire data were correlated with sensor measures using both parametric and nonparametric methods in the entire patient sample [2]. Finally, the formulas and assumptions used in the analysis of each sensor were fully documented to ensure the reliability and reproducibility of the results. The results of the study will provide a better understanding of the interrelationships between physiological indicators and clinical endpoints and potentially contribute to the development of personalized medicine strategies in oncology [3].

Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.