Impact of Surgical Margins on Overall Survival Following Kidney Tumor Resection

Introduction Kidney tumor resection is a primary treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma, aimed not only at removing the tumor but also at preserving kidney function[1]. During surgery, the main objective is to excise the tumor with clean surgical margins. Leaving a positive resection margin is believed to increase the risk of cancer recurrence[2]. Nevertheless, the effect of surgical margins on overall survival (OS) remains a subject of ongoing debate. While some studies suggest that positive margins may negatively impact OS, others indicate minimal influence when appropriate follow-up and adjuvant treatments are employed. Aim To assess how surgical margins influence overall survival in renal cancer patients, aiming to understand their significance for optimizing surgical strategies and improving long-term outcomes. Methods This retrospective study included 768 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy due to kidney cancer at a tertiary university center from 2012 to 2023. The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as the time from surgery to the last follow-up or death. Survival status (alive or deceased) was recorded and Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to estimate 5- and 10-year OS rates. The log-rank test was used to compare survival outcomes between patients with positive surgical margins and negative surgical margins. Clinical and pathological parameters were analyzed for comparison between the two groups. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The study population consisted of 1065 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy. 768 patients (72%) had malignant tumors, while 28% were benign. The median age of the patients was 63.25 years (range: 29–85), and the median tumor size was 3.29 cm. Pathological staging revealed pT1a in 76% of cases, pT1b in 16.6%, and pT3 in 7.1%. The dominant histological type was clear cell carcinoma, accounting for 77.1% of cases. Positive surgical margins (R1) were observed in 95 patients (12.2%). The estimated 5-year and 10-year clinical progression-free survival (CPFS) rates for the entire cohort were 91.41% and 85.94%, respectively. No statistically significant difference in CPFS was noted between patients with negative surgical margins (R0) and those with positive margins (R1). The 5-year CPFS was 89.4% for R0 and 86.6% for R1, while the 10- year CPFS was 73.6% for R0 and 59.2% for R1. p = 0.331 Conclusions In the analyzed patient group, surgical margin status after partial nephrectomy was not found to have a statistically significant impact on overall survival. These results indicate that, with proper monitoring and care, positive surgical margins might not negatively affect long-term survival outcomes in patients undergoing kidney tumor removal.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Published
2025-03-13
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Surgical Margins on Overall Survival Following Kidney Tumor Resection

Daimantas Milonas, Giedrius Šulskus
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Impact of Surgical Margins on Overall Survival Following Kidney Tumor Resection

Daimantas Milonas, Giedrius Šulskus
article en

Abstract

Introduction Kidney tumor resection is a primary treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma, aimed not only at removing the tumor but also at preserving kidney function[1]. During surgery, the main objective is to excise the tumor with clean surgical margins. Leaving a positive resection margin is believed to increase the risk of cancer recurrence[2]. Nevertheless, the effect of surgical margins on overall survival (OS) remains a subject of ongoing debate. While some studies suggest that positive margins may negatively impact OS, others indicate minimal influence when appropriate follow-up and adjuvant treatments are employed. Aim To assess how surgical margins influence overall survival in renal cancer patients, aiming to understand their significance for optimizing surgical strategies and improving long-term outcomes. Methods This retrospective study included 768 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy due to kidney cancer at a tertiary university center from 2012 to 2023. The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as the time from surgery to the last follow-up or death. Survival status (alive or deceased) was recorded and Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to estimate 5- and 10-year OS rates. The log-rank test was used to compare survival outcomes between patients with positive surgical margins and negative surgical margins. Clinical and pathological parameters were analyzed for comparison between the two groups. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The study population consisted of 1065 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy. 768 patients (72%) had malignant tumors, while 28% were benign. The median age of the patients was 63.25 years (range: 29–85), and the median tumor size was 3.29 cm. Pathological staging revealed pT1a in 76% of cases, pT1b in 16.6%, and pT3 in 7.1%. The dominant histological type was clear cell carcinoma, accounting for 77.1% of cases. Positive surgical margins (R1) were observed in 95 patients (12.2%). The estimated 5-year and 10-year clinical progression-free survival (CPFS) rates for the entire cohort were 91.41% and 85.94%, respectively. No statistically significant difference in CPFS was noted between patients with negative surgical margins (R0) and those with positive margins (R1). The 5-year CPFS was 89.4% for R0 and 86.6% for R1, while the 10- year CPFS was 73.6% for R0 and 59.2% for R1. p = 0.331 Conclusions In the analyzed patient group, surgical margin status after partial nephrectomy was not found to have a statistically significant impact on overall survival. These results indicate that, with proper monitoring and care, positive surgical margins might not negatively affect long-term survival outcomes in patients undergoing kidney tumor removal.

Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.