Conservation targets and how to achieve them

The fifteenth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity adopted four Global Goals for 2050 and 23 Targets for 2030. One concern has been the lack of a monitoring mechanism to measure the progress of countries in protecting biodiversity as a step towards the 2050 Goal of 'halting extinction'. Clearly defined conservation targets are essential. There is abundant quantitative evidence of human impacts. We ask three questions. (i) Does conservation slow global extinction rates? (ii) Does conservation rescue previously declining populations? (iii) What is the progress of protecting areas globally? Are such areas selected optimally to slow extinctions and reverse population declines? We find a disconnect between unsupported claims about impending planetary doom and carefully documented evidence of conservation's successes and failures. Certainly, gaps exist in our knowledge about biodiversity loss. Nonetheless, conservation has prevented extinctions and allowed some once-declining species to flourish. It protects ever-greater areas of land and ocean, often doing so in sensible places. Future success will depend on clearly defined metrics to measure what works and what does not. Such a recommendation resonates strongly with the work that Professor Dame Georgina Mace pioneered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.2626
Primary Topic
Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conservation targets and how to achieve them

Kyle S. Van Houtan, Daniel Simberloff, Callum M. Roberts, John L. Gittleman et al.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
article

Conservation targets and how to achieve them

Kyle S. Van Houtan, Daniel Simberloff, Callum M. Roberts, John L. Gittleman, Stuart L. Pimm, Berndt J van Rensburg
article en

Abstract

The fifteenth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity adopted four Global Goals for 2050 and 23 Targets for 2030. One concern has been the lack of a monitoring mechanism to measure the progress of countries in protecting biodiversity as a step towards the 2050 Goal of 'halting extinction'. Clearly defined conservation targets are essential. There is abundant quantitative evidence of human impacts. We ask three questions. (i) Does conservation slow global extinction rates? (ii) Does conservation rescue previously declining populations? (iii) What is the progress of protecting areas globally? Are such areas selected optimally to slow extinctions and reverse population declines? We find a disconnect between unsupported claims about impending planetary doom and carefully documented evidence of conservation's successes and failures. Certainly, gaps exist in our knowledge about biodiversity loss. Nonetheless, conservation has prevented extinctions and allowed some once-declining species to flourish. It protects ever-greater areas of land and ocean, often doing so in sensible places. Future success will depend on clearly defined metrics to measure what works and what does not. Such a recommendation resonates strongly with the work that Professor Dame Georgina Mace pioneered.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 293(2065)
University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Georgia (US), Duke University (US), University of Exeter (GB), University of Johannesburg (ZA), Duke Energy (United States) (US), Duke University Hospital (US), University of Pretoria (ZA), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), Palm Beach Atlantic University (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.