Testing of Pre‐Operative Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Randomised Controlled Trials: A Scoping Review

This scoping review investigated contemporary practise in test methodology reporting in RCTs involving PNBs. We found that although most trials do report testing PNBs, about one in four did not. Furthermore, approximately two in five trials did not define what constituted a successful block or report PNB success rates. Lack of consistent and transparent test methodology poses challenges when comparing trials and performing meta-analyses, and in translating trial findings into clinical practise. This scoping review exposes a methodological blind spot in regional anaesthesia research. Despite widespread use of peripheral nerve blocks, a substantial proportion of randomised trials fail to report testing methods, success definitions, or handling of failed blocks. Such omissions undermine interpretability, comparability, and clinical translation, and strengthen the case for standardised reporting of regional anaesthesia assessment in future trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70211
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing of Pre‐Operative Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Randomised Controlled Trials: A Scoping Review

Sina Yousef, Roland Knudsen, Kai Henrik Wiborg Lange, Sine Wichmann et al.
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Testing of Pre‐Operative Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Randomised Controlled Trials: A Scoping Review

Sina Yousef, Roland Knudsen, Kai Henrik Wiborg Lange, Sine Wichmann, Anders Kehlet Nørskov, Lars Hyldborg Lundstrøm, Mathias T. Steensbæk, Jonas Erasmus Egede Glahn, Rikke Helene Frølund Bjulf, Anne-Sofie Linde Jellestad, Aurelien-Xuan Rosendal Bahuet
article en

Abstract

This scoping review investigated contemporary practise in test methodology reporting in RCTs involving PNBs. We found that although most trials do report testing PNBs, about one in four did not. Furthermore, approximately two in five trials did not define what constituted a successful block or report PNB success rates. Lack of consistent and transparent test methodology poses challenges when comparing trials and performing meta-analyses, and in translating trial findings into clinical practise. This scoping review exposes a methodological blind spot in regional anaesthesia research. Despite widespread use of peripheral nerve blocks, a substantial proportion of randomised trials fail to report testing methods, success definitions, or handling of failed blocks. Such omissions undermine interpretability, comparability, and clinical translation, and strengthen the case for standardised reporting of regional anaesthesia assessment in future trials.

Acta Anaesthesiologica ScandinavicaVol. 70(4)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.