The role of institutional logic: a new dynamic typology for policy innovation labs

Policy innovation labs (PILs) are established globally to address complex public challenges. PILS are distinguished by their focus on fostering innovation, promoting collaborative co-design, and engaging in experimentation. The current literature highlights structural characteristics that define PILs, such as their source of funding, their autonomy from government agencies, and the tools that are utilized. This paper provides a dynamic perspective by focusing on the institutional logics of PILs, which are socially constructed patterns of symbols, practices, values, and beliefs that guide decision-making and shape organizational behavior. Drawing from semi-structured interviews with 31 managers from European PILs, we identify three distinct institutional logics: professional, political, and instrumental. These logics are critical in determining three key work activities: assessment, orientation, and evidence-based policy design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Design and Practice
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2026.2634464
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of institutional logic: a new dynamic typology for policy innovation labs

Anat Gofen, ADAM M. WELLSTEAD, Esti Hoss-Golan
Policy Design and Practice
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
article

The role of institutional logic: a new dynamic typology for policy innovation labs

Anat Gofen, ADAM M. WELLSTEAD, Esti Hoss-Golan
article en

Abstract

Policy innovation labs (PILs) are established globally to address complex public challenges. PILS are distinguished by their focus on fostering innovation, promoting collaborative co-design, and engaging in experimentation. The current literature highlights structural characteristics that define PILs, such as their source of funding, their autonomy from government agencies, and the tools that are utilized. This paper provides a dynamic perspective by focusing on the institutional logics of PILs, which are socially constructed patterns of symbols, practices, values, and beliefs that guide decision-making and shape organizational behavior. Drawing from semi-structured interviews with 31 managers from European PILs, we identify three distinct institutional logics: professional, political, and instrumental. These logics are critical in determining three key work activities: assessment, orientation, and evidence-based policy design.

Policy Design and Practice
Michigan Technological University (US), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.