Assessing student learning in quantum computing: lessons from developing a test item on phase kickback

A major challenge for quantum workforce development is the need to both understand and reliably assess student learning of quantum information science (QIS) fundamentals. Yet student thinking is notoriously difficult to probe, even for seasoned education researchers. This article presents the story of Item 15 on the Quantum Computing Conceptual Survey (QCCS). This assessment item underwent more revision and discussion within the team than the remaining 19 assessment questions combined. This paper provides a behind-the-scenes look at the development of this assessment question: a story that both reveals interesting findings about student reasoning in quantum computing and illustrates why quantum education researchers insist on triangulating diverse quantitative and qualitative data sources when developing and refining assessment items, with implications for any researcher looking to understand and measure student conceptual reasoning in quantum computing, as well as for QIS curriculum and workforce development more broadly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EPJ Quantum Technology
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-026-00564-1
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Assessing student learning in quantum computing: lessons from developing a test item on phase kickback

Bethany R. Wilcox, Steven J. Pollock, Gina Passante, Josephine C. Meyer
EPJ Quantum Technology
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Assessing student learning in quantum computing: lessons from developing a test item on phase kickback

Bethany R. Wilcox, Steven J. Pollock, Gina Passante, Josephine C. Meyer
article en

Abstract

A major challenge for quantum workforce development is the need to both understand and reliably assess student learning of quantum information science (QIS) fundamentals. Yet student thinking is notoriously difficult to probe, even for seasoned education researchers. This article presents the story of Item 15 on the Quantum Computing Conceptual Survey (QCCS). This assessment item underwent more revision and discussion within the team than the remaining 19 assessment questions combined. This paper provides a behind-the-scenes look at the development of this assessment question: a story that both reveals interesting findings about student reasoning in quantum computing and illustrates why quantum education researchers insist on triangulating diverse quantitative and qualitative data sources when developing and refining assessment items, with implications for any researcher looking to understand and measure student conceptual reasoning in quantum computing, as well as for QIS curriculum and workforce development more broadly.

EPJ Quantum Technology
California State University, Fullerton (US), George Mason University (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), California State University, San Marcos (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing student learning in quantum computing: lessons from developing a test item on phase kickback — Bethany R. Wilcox, Steven J. Pollock, et al. · EPJ Quantum Technology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS