Vocal attractiveness in homosexual and heterosexual listeners

Abstract The voice is a common carrier for a wide range of communicative signals as well as cues to stable attributes of the speaker, such as secondary sexual characteristics. Previous research on heterosexual courtship indicates a preference for voices that exaggerate sex-typical features which speakers may attempt to manipulate by modulating their voices. However, research often excludes homosexual listeners on the assumption that their voice preferences are less aligned with theories of sexual selection. This study investigated voice attractiveness ratings among female and male heterosexual and homosexual participants. Participants rated voices that were either synthetically masculinized/feminized (Experiment 1) or modulated more naturalistically by speakers imitating auditory targets (Experiment 2). We replicate heterosexual preference for voices that exaggerate sexually dimorphic cues. However, including data from homosexual listeners provided a richer context, revealing that all listener groups apart from heterosexual males favoured masculinized voices. Despite differences in how groups responded to voice modulation, there was strong consensus across sexual orientations regarding which unmodulated voice identities were most attractive, highlighting the additive influence of voice features that are unrelated to sexual dimorphism. Our findings demonstrate the added scientific value of widening the inclusivity of voice research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.251815
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vocal attractiveness in homosexual and heterosexual listeners

L Horák, Camilla Beone, Michel Belyk, Carolyn McGettigan
Royal Society Open Science
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
article

Vocal attractiveness in homosexual and heterosexual listeners

L Horák, Camilla Beone, Michel Belyk, Carolyn McGettigan
article en

Abstract

Abstract The voice is a common carrier for a wide range of communicative signals as well as cues to stable attributes of the speaker, such as secondary sexual characteristics. Previous research on heterosexual courtship indicates a preference for voices that exaggerate sex-typical features which speakers may attempt to manipulate by modulating their voices. However, research often excludes homosexual listeners on the assumption that their voice preferences are less aligned with theories of sexual selection. This study investigated voice attractiveness ratings among female and male heterosexual and homosexual participants. Participants rated voices that were either synthetically masculinized/feminized (Experiment 1) or modulated more naturalistically by speakers imitating auditory targets (Experiment 2). We replicate heterosexual preference for voices that exaggerate sexually dimorphic cues. However, including data from homosexual listeners provided a richer context, revealing that all listener groups apart from heterosexual males favoured masculinized voices. Despite differences in how groups responded to voice modulation, there was strong consensus across sexual orientations regarding which unmodulated voice identities were most attractive, highlighting the additive influence of voice features that are unrelated to sexual dimorphism. Our findings demonstrate the added scientific value of widening the inclusivity of voice research.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 13(2)
Edge Hill University (GB), The London College (GB), University College London (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.